YeuEmMaiMai
Extremely [H]
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2004
- Messages
- 34,165
i have an e8500 running along at the specs in my sig....you can definatemy oc that e8400, those chips have TONS of overhead on them
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Great! Now you have no reasons to buy BF3 so look how much money you saved from also not having to upgrade your computer.
he said it ran. He didn't say what kind of fps he was getting.
So don't buy it and stop whining about it. Problem solved.I "want" to upgrade my PC, but not for one game with a 5hr campaign{I don't do mindless MP shooting}
please stop posting.
So don't buy it and stop whining about it.
I "want" to upgrade my PC, but not for one game with a 5hr campaign{I don't do mindless MP shooting}
I "want" to upgrade my PC, but not for one game with a 5hr campaign{I don't do mindless MP shooting}
So I'm playin on lower resolutions that seem to work and not sacrifice too much graphics.
I'm giving BF3 a chance here, and willing to wait for a couple patches and have to take in consideration my current rig..but with that said...
I think overall BC2 flows better. Maybe it's the maps, weapons, I don't really know yet, but BF3 is not capturing me yet like BC2 did. I'll check back in a week but so far, not in love with it.
It takes time to get used to the BF3 mechanics. It is not like BC2. I've played both.
I tried BF3 with a dual core. It was pretty sad indeed. If you get an AMD chip make sure you don't get one of the new Bulldozers. They aren't compatible with certain SteamWorks games.
Hi guys, this is a bit off topic but here goes, right now I have a Q6600 @ 3ghz, 4gig DDR2, and a single 5870 2gig running 1920x1200. Is it worth it to buy a Crossfire mobo and an additional 5870? Or should I go another route??
edit: can my 2gb 5870 crossfire with a 1gib 5870??
Who mentioned Ultra?....not me.
Wow just wow. I've never seen the [H] give such universally bad advice. First of all bf3 is less cpu dependent than bc2. Bf3 is more gpu dependent though. In fact all the benchmarks I've seen have shown not a whole lot of difference between a dual core and a quad core in this game. Save your advice till you know what you're talking about.
http://www.techspot.com/review/458-battlefield-3-performance/page7.html
You must not visit the Video Cards forum very often.Wow just wow. I've never seen the [H] give such universally bad advice.
You must not visit the Video Cards forum very often.
yeah the one game that proves that gpu physics acceleration is useless and unneeded. the one game that proves theres actually a reason to use a quad core or hex core processor.
the difference between BF3 and all those games you listed is the exact reason why pc gaming is dying. none of them are willing to push the boundaries of hardware requirements to play a game. all of those games in your list are using 2-5 year old engines(except for duke which uses a 10 year old engine) or use physX in the case of batman and look absolutely stupid in the process.
been running BC2 for almost 2 years with an overclocked processor and heavily overclocked gpu, never once have i had a single issue with the game with either overclock. hell i've never had a single problem with the game period except when nvidia broke the bloom support for BC2 in their drivers and would cause the game to randomly white screen.
the only reason BC2 would have a problem with an overclocked processor is because the overclock was never stable which means it was user error and not the game.