I read this review of the Koolance full cover versus the MCW60: http://www.pureoverclock.com/review.php?id=938&page=6
It seemed as though the MCW60 performed about the same for memory, shader, and GPU temperatures, whereas the stock temperatures were way higher. In the review, he says:
Does anyone know what passive heatsinks he is talking about? There are none that come with the MCW60.
I'm new to "new hardware" .. I used to be old school. Sorry for the question, I know you guys can't read my mind.. I'm just not sure if I'm missing something obvious. If I can get away with a high-flow, half-the-price, universal waterblock and get the same amount of cooling, then why wouldn't I?
Thanks!
It seemed as though the MCW60 performed about the same for memory, shader, and GPU temperatures, whereas the stock temperatures were way higher. In the review, he says:
However, the results indicating the memory temperatures trail behind the passive heatsinks by only 1 degree, and we believe that is due to the imperfect mounting of the block and a different type of thermal pad used for each block.
Does anyone know what passive heatsinks he is talking about? There are none that come with the MCW60.
I'm new to "new hardware" .. I used to be old school. Sorry for the question, I know you guys can't read my mind.. I'm just not sure if I'm missing something obvious. If I can get away with a high-flow, half-the-price, universal waterblock and get the same amount of cooling, then why wouldn't I?
Thanks!