Unigine "Heaven" DirectX 11 Benchmark

what's wrong with the link?


*edit: you have to give it more than 27 seconds for the post to show up.
 
Last edited:
Very nice graphics. I kept imagining I was seeing Elder Scrolls 5.. Hey, I can dream, right?
 
has any games been announced that plan to use this engine?
it looks beautiful
 
Haha my thoughts exactly, those roads look "painful" for human, horse and cart.

I'm pretty sure even 100's of years ago, a 1000 years ago, roads were never that bad.

Very nice video.
 
A great example of why Larabee is miles away from being used as a game engine any time soon. Nvidia have been right to hit back at Intel on thre real time ray tracing front.

Unigine also has some neat glass and fog FX, roll on next gen games :)
 
While YouTube HD looks horrible, I have to say that this engine demo doesn't look all that bad.
 
sooo when we gona have games that look link this ? :( you know put my thousands of dollars worth of computer hardware to use.
 
FIrst to post benchmarks? :)


Unigine
Heaven Demo v1.0
FPS:
27.8
Scores:
701
Hardware
Binary:
Windows 32bit Visual C++ 1500 Release Oct 22 2009
Operating system:
Windows 7 (build 7600) 64bit
CPU model:
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q9550 @ 2.83GHz
CPU flags:
3399MHz MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE41 HTT
GPU model:
ATI Radeon HD 5800 Series 8.661.0.0 1024Mb
Settings
Render:
direct3d11
Mode:
1920x1200 4xAA fullscreen
Shaders:
high
Textures:
high
Filter:
trilinear
Anisotropy:
4x
Occlusion:
enabled
Refraction:
enabled
Volumetric:
enabled
Unigine Corp. © 2005-2009


cpu overclocked as described, stock GPU settings on a 5870
 
That engine is really cheap too (40,000 for the top of the line liscence). I wonder how many devs will take advantage of the engine and really make something good with it. (14 so far it looks like)
 
Well, it's not working on my PC. I'm having a driver error with my ATI 5770 card, on Win7 x64.

Engine:init(): clear video settings for "ATI Radeon HD 5700 Series 8.660.6.0"
ALSound::require_extension(): required extension
AL_EXT_LINEAR_DISTANCE is not supported.
 
my score @ DX 10.
Heaven Demo v1.0FPS: 57.8
Scores: 1457

HardwareBinary: Windows 32bit Visual C++ 1500 Release Oct 22 2009
Operating system: Windows Vista (build 6002, Service Pack 2) 64bit
CPU model: AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 955 Processor
CPU flags: 3608MHz MMX+ 3DNow!+ SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSE4A HTT
GPU model: ATI Radeon HD 4800 Series 8.01.01.949 512Mb

SettingsRender: direct3d10
Mode: 1024x768 windowed
Shaders: high
Textures: high
Filter: trilinear
Anisotropy: 4x
Occlusion: enabled
Refraction: enabled
Volumetric: enabled
 
Anyone else creeped out by the town?

this reminds me far too much of the myst games
 
unigine2.jpg


Looks nice.
 
Looks really nice especially considering the demo is only 127megs.
 
[edit]
it actually ran really nice on my aging system.
Scored 885 w/ 32.9FPS useing all default settings except for DX10
Code: 
Unigine
Heaven Demo v1.0
FPS: 33.9 
Scores: 855 

Hardware
Binary: Windows 32bit Visual C++ 1500 Release Oct 22 2009 
Operating system: Windows Vista (build 6002, Service Pack 2) 64bit 
CPU model: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4600+ 
CPU flags: 2684MHz MMX+ 3DNow!+ SSE SSE2 SSE3 HTT 
GPU model: ATI Radeon HD 3800 Series 8.01.01.961 512Mb 

Settings
Render: direct3d10 
Mode: 1024x768 windowed 
Shaders: high 
Textures: high 
Filter: trilinear 
Anisotropy: 4x 
Occlusion: enabled 
Refraction: enabled 
Volumetric: enabled
 
Nice looking demo. Patiently waiting to see what the developers turn out.
 
Tried the DX10 version with 3D Vision for the lols - slowed my dual-8800 machine to a crawl.
 
Hard to tell from watching the video, was the grass just layered sprites like most game or did it seem like real blades of grass? Seems like trees and grass have always been the lowest priority on making 3D even though its one of the most common elements in most games.
 
Was I supposed to be seeing something? Looked DX9 to me....(?)
Cool demo but I missed anything mind blowing.
 
I guess my only critism is the texture/effects pop-in/jiggling, extreme over-use of the DOF, and the lack of time spent on night-time lighting (which didn't look that great afaict, so I can understand they wanted to only show the best stuff about the engine).

Otherwise, yes, it looked good, and it's nice to see some new stuff!
 
toddw said:
Was I supposed to be seeing something? Looked DX9 to me....(?)
Cool demo but I missed anything mind blowing.
Click to expand...
Yeah I agree, but I think that's the reality of progress, it's going to get slower and slower as we approach realism
 
toddw said:
Was I supposed to be seeing something? Looked DX9 to me....(?)
Cool demo but I missed anything mind blowing.
Click to expand...

same, didnt see anything wow at all. Definitely cool art direction, and lots of out of focus blurring, but not impressed atm. I am sure that will change in time.
 
Really? I was *very* impressed. Been gaming for a long time and this is pretty mind blowing in terms of visual quality.

What stood out? Well, it was pretty much the amount of detail in everything: rocks, buildings, stairs, etc.

If you just look at it quickly, it looks like older demos we've seen... but the closer you look, the more you realize that it's all about the additional details that make it really impressive.

ps. The roads were "over-bumped" to show off a new feature in DX11.
 
FPS: 63.1
Score: 1590

All settings default except resolution (set to monitor native).

2d6mnbb.jpg
 
killboy said:
ps. The roads were "over-bumped" to show off a new feature in DX11.
Click to expand...

yeah no joke, damn. I worked for a paving company a few weeks back, These guys can give us a call if they need some help we'll do the job cheap...

getting the trucks on location might be a bit of a problem...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top