So I'm assuming the Intel's igpu will be priced commensurate to the performance increase over a ryzen, or will it be outrageously expensive? I'm betting the latter.
It's a difficult business because they start planning and design 5 years ago and all they can do is predict where things would be now.
It's like saying what new games and technology will be out 5 years from now.
I dont put faith into that vague interview. They had some challenges with 10nm?
And theyre pleased with their progress on 7nm per internal plans? So Intels internal plans for 7nm could be 2050 and be 2% of the way there and that statement would still be accurate.
Going with the professional market now is a smart move. More profits to get my stocks up.
No need to bring out a gaming card since they're selling everything they make and probably still short on HBM.
When the crypto market collapses, then it would be a good time to bring out the 7mm vega for...
There will always be flaws. If you buy a Meltdown and Spectre fixed CPU in the future, they'll find another CPU flaw a couple years after you buy it. It's a never ending battle.
Then there are also flaws you will never know about....
Those stats have nothing to do with CPU sales. The stats are based off the number of people running the benchmark program, not people buying the CPU. It's expected AMD would be significantly higher because people want to test the new CPU.