Recent content by Thomas R

OK - thank you. The performance step is too small.

That´s my question. Are there four 6344 ES better for FAH than four 6274 retail?

OK. Thanks anyway !!

Since last Saturday no problems with the upload! I´m confused: Is the problem now at my side or at stanford´s ??

OK - sudo ping -f: LAN Upload/Download: From Windows-PC to Linux-PC: File with 2,7GB in 4min36sec From Linux-PC to Windows-PC: File with 2,7GB in 5min45sec dmesg: Anything like this? Update: The last unit goes out without any issue. I dont know if this is helpfull...?! Update Sunday: The...

Is there any atribute for ping -f I must write? Started a test-download with a 1GB-File: Maximum speed with 252Kb/s (This is the maximum from my Internet-connection) Can not start an upload because I have no email or FTP-programm installed here (and I dont know how to do this in...

And than this: :confused::confused::confused:

Yes - there are five systems in this location. One of them (this one I write now) has problems to. But it is the same: one time it is no problem to send the units. The next day it is´nt possible to send a unit. The other two systems who run for F@H have no problems!

I can´t tell you if the units come from the same or different server. How or where can I proof this? Only the server where the units are sent to, is the same. Or is it the server-ip on the pic? Because this is the ip where the client tries to send. About the firewall: Is Ubuntu comming with...

I had five ready WU´s in the work-folder. OK - I could not solve the problem! I´ve done as tear has written. The rig was sending data to stanford over hours. I´ve seen this with etherape. In sum a total of 248MB has been sent to stanford. Than, about seven hours ago I started the process, the...

New problems again........Can´t get connected to the server! Two finished units are in the work-folder. I get this massage: [11:55:52] + Could not connect to Work Server (results) [11:55:52] (128.143.199.97:80) [11:55:52] Could not transmit unit 01 to Collection server; keeping in...

No - not more. And courious - FAHControl goes up to 4% and falls than down to 2%. After this the error appears.

Sorry - I´m from Germany and my english is bad. What I mean was, the problem comes when the card is not oced and comes when the card is oced. That was what I mean with "It makes no reason if the GPU is running in normal or oced." This is what I get the hole time:

It makes no reason if the GPU is running in normal or oced. As i've written - two GTX680.

My System: Core i7 950, 8GB RAM, two GTX680 Problem: The first GPU crunches the 7663 without any problem. The second breaks every time at 2%. I never had any problem with any other GPU-WU. And I've given 4 off the CPU-Cores extra to task core17. What could I do?