Recent content by Sith'ari

Nice analysis Brent , but can you explain something because otherwise i'm unable to understand : since undervolting can result all these that you mentioned above (lesser power , same performance) ,then why exactly AMD doesn't sell this card with lesser voltage at default :eek:??? THERE MUST be...

exactly, if VULCAN is helping for a better gaming-design, then the market will auto-adjust herself , short-term or long-term.

For good or bad the rules of the free-market apply. If you want to change them , then we must change them for everybody, not for AMD especially, that's what i'm saying.

well, other people talked with lawyers as well about razor1 's comments (* https://hardforum.com/threads/geforce-partner-program-impacts-consumer-choice.1955963/page-16 ) and it has been claimed that razor1 's points are wrong. Since that happened here in public view, then i believe that he has...

1)So, how it gets better, if someone adds a post in which simply mocks someone? at least, he should bother to explain his own arguments. 2) !!! Do you know a company that gives away free benefits without asking something in return ??? of course, this is a give & take kind of agreement. If the...

how much i like statements which are using concrete & logical arguments!!:rolleyes: You know, since you are mocking people who dare to express their opinion , at least, please do bother to explain us the reasons that you disagree with those you mock...;)

All these are great info, but i want to focus at my previous question: Legally, does AMD have any right to intervene into an agreement among 3rd companies such as NVidia and her AIBs ? Just like you said before , "does Samsung has any right to guide the OEMs, just because it sells them some...

What i can't understand is how this is AMD's issue and not an AIB's issue. Does AMD have any legal rights to the products that the AIBs sell, and they contain AMD processors inside ? i assume that the AIBs have bought-out from AMD the rights to sell her products and that's it. For example : AMD...

ok, how about a "right" or "wrong" then? as i said, i'm most curious...

about what exactly? lawyers are supposed to pay attention to detail, not making vague statements.. Anyway, can you ask your lawyer what does he think about my arguments at #589 post? i'm most curious to hear what he has to say;)

I don't remember ATI having any problems to keep up with the competition prior the bought out. Are you referring to what exactly ? Radeon X600 line ? :confused:

that's fine since it's your personal opinion, but i have to ask you something: You do remember that AMD has bought out ATI right? And how strong & formidable the Radeon GPUs have been prior the bought out ? So if i was an ATI fan, i would ask myself : "How things would have gone for ATI if AMD...

yeah, too bad though that the 98% of windows-users at Steam Survey suggests otherwise !!;)

exactly. !! Just like i said in a previous post of mine, ASUS already has a different brand name : the "CERBERUS" brand ( https://www.asus.com/us/Graphics-Cards/CERBERUS-GTX1070TI-A8G/ )

-Personally, i like VERY much to compare between similar situations. This is -to me- , the most important method in order to conclude my results. P.S. Anyway, i want to put it as plain & simple as i can: The hole point of AMD's arguments is that their interests will be damaged if AIBs follow...