Yeah...it's not the CEOs setting their own remuneration, they just ask for it. The board of directors, and by extension the voting shareholders are the ones who accept huge offers to attract their must-have employee. It's an arms race between corporates, offer to pay less and another entity will...
Saw a figure the other day that something like four fifths of industrial espionage in America is assumed to be Chinese in origin.
Probably pales in comparison to all the things they force foreign companies to do in China, if they want to buddy up with a local manufacturer.
Sometimes I do feel kinda sorry for corporates like Google and the relentless torrent of filth and complaints they have to deal with. Commanding the tide to stop, really.
Then I remember the last half dozen kneejerk demonetisations and copyright strikes, and I stop feeling pity for them.
A man grabbing another man by the balls is probably sexed behaviour, but sexist? Against whom?
Is the issue that women don't feel comfortable with grabbing them by the old Johnson?
The "government" doesn't have a majority, this has veen a bipartisan assault on the rights of companies and individuals.
Very much a continued theme here.
Can Amazon run a service where you press a button on their app, and a drone whooshes out of their warehouse to drop you a can of bear spray in a timely manner?
Sounds like an idea. Why carry hiking equipment when you can walk unencumbered and let the robots do the hard work?
Dang, they had to cut a big mushroom of cartilage out of me.
Maybe they should have offered it to you guys secondhand? If I can figure out how to keep growing the stuff, this could turn into a business model!
Where I am, the issue is that they DIDN'T protect the taxi cartel.
It was legally impossible to operate a taxi without a bunch of background checks, extra certifications and a fee (well into six figures) to the state government for an accreditation.
Yet, mysteriously, the ride-share services...