Recent content by Jay_2

I have looked into this a bit more and the only reason I can see that this is done is so you can easily move the config of the interface to another interface.

Yes 5505, I see lots of boiler plate configs this way and was just wondering why. Thanks for your help.

Hi, A quick question, why is a vlan created on the outside interface rather than the settings and security level assigned directly to the interface?

What router is it?

What ASA are you using? Also what is 192.10.0.x and 192.10.1.x used for?

Show local-host Ditch the pix asap and get a 5515 or if budget is tight a 5505. Just keep in mind the 5505 will go end of sale soon I think.

Ok, like I said, thanks for the input. What's with the slightly snide attitude here? Anyway, thanks to everyone who chipped in with advice.

Ok, thanks for the input.

Perfect, that's the answer I needed, thanks. To be honest the issues I had with auto negotiations was 100Mbps connections, thinking back it was always 1841 and 3560s that I had this with as well. This backs up what you said...

Strange you have never come across this then.

So when connecting a switch to a router you guys never set the speed and duplex on both sides? Many many times I have walked into "our internet is slow" or "we have strange issues with failed downloads" it's always been due to the router and switch having a speed and or duplex mismatch when set...

Cisco question I was setting up a 2960s 10G for iSCSI and was told that Cisco do not recommend setting the speed and duplex on each end of anything above 1Gbps. In the past anything like servers, switch to switch, switch to router I have always manually set speed and duplex to stop mismatch...

This is sounding more like a quick fix to a disk space issue to me.

I still use my 2 for VMware with a qnap nas for shared storage and 16GB of ram in each, it's fine but the cpu is a bit limiting.

Do you use 8.1 enterprise at work? If so take a look at windows2go