There must have been some updates to the QN900C/One Connect Box since the first QN900C I tried because I am yet to experience any kind of dropout even at 144 hz while the previous one had them all the time. And this is with the long cable as...
There are additional "weirdness" with dithering etc that comes into play. It is doable but as a monitor nut, it would have to be better than that in order not for me to start looking into alternatives (lika a 4K side monitor). The Multi view...
Was able to get the Multi View working but it seems to require disabling Game Mode which also seem to break 4:4:4 which basically makes it pointless for anything text related (at least compared to an actual monitor).
QN900C has support for 4 multi view "areas" up from only 2 on the QN900B. But there seems to be some incompatability only giving me "not supported" but will try more when I have time for it.
Don't really mind if people prefer curved, and if I were to build a racing sim or something like that where immersion was the key, I might prefer that as well. But never for productivity. And neither does Samsung it seems, based on the fact that...
I am really against the dual monitor approach, mainly as I feel like I am on a constant holy quest to find the ideal monitor that can do it all. But having a PG32UCDM as well now, I am considering the idea of just keeping it to the side and just...
Never really seen 60 hz for productivity as a problem, probably because I am used to things way worse then high PPI 60 hz from my glory days. Would imagine that there are smothing options in the TV if needed/wanted. That is however one reason I...
Must say that the quality of text and other "desktop stuff" is really remarkable good on the QN900C (and the B/D). That glossy coating and the wide viewing angle really does help a lot with removing the grain and also combating the poor viewing...
Which is kind of ironic as that is the only real usage I can see for 8K at the moment. But I guess that the number of people willing to pay for an 8K 65" to use at the desk is limited :)
Until proven wrong, I expect the QN900D to be better than the QN900C but more of an evolution than a revolution. The marketing is kind of the same as it has been every year with mostly vague claims and new invented expressions and Samsung pseudo...
Seems like few have yet to compare it with the QN900C from what I have seen, while it is naturally more of an upgraded from the QN900A as even the QN900B was that. My intended usage is also only as a PC monitor, perhaps flanked by an 240 hz OLED...
As the QN900C had its price lowered substantially (with some additional edu discounts etc) and the QN900D as expected did not turn out to be that revolution it was initially touted to be by some "reviews", I now find myself again with a 65"...