Recent content by Dermac

If you aren't already maxing out the 7700K in terms of threads, then the 2700/2700X is a side-grade at best. But for my use, I can game on one monitor and have a full 1080p youtube video playing on the other monitor with the Twitch App, Discord, OBS and X number of tasks all running in the...

I imagine this is what Juan is talking about, made it nice and easy to see since going back and re-reading posts is a pain. As I said, at least I don't know how much AMD charges for a non-consumer level part. Not that it matters though for most peoples needs, it's not like we determine if an...

Ok, sitting alone in a bar on your Blackberry.

To be fair, Intel went from Broadwell => Skylake with a very minor update as well.

Googling Juanrga is interesting, so do you just post on forums all day long, is this your job? Is it your mission in life to be called into question on more than 10 tech forums, trying to get some sort of achievement or something? Well, I wish you well in your job, hope Intel pays you well.

See, and there isn't all the questions about this or that, they tested on a motherboard that doesn't put a 10% negative impact on the CPU. If CPC just did this they wouldn't have all the questions, about their testing standards. Also isn't that higher than the jump from 6700 to 7700 though?

Ok, sources on the 'some people'. Are these real 'people' or just voices you thought you heard in 2016. As far as I know on this forum, no person has said they expected the Ryzen refresh to boost up to 4.8ghz, 12LP or not. From the quotes (albeit no sources with those) they seem like your...

No, that can't be, AMD must be omnipresent cheating.

The obvious answer is no. He can only speculate on performance and refer to other peoples work to relay information based on said work.

I guess it would have been easier to just include the results from the x370 and the x470 and the b350 and the b450 motherboards they totally tested when the published the article. Since they had the testing totally done, they could have used REAL numbers to show the differences and the ever...

So that 2600 is a retail chip, you said it was. But I guess that chip isn't a retail chip, so they didn't test only retail chips then? What other things are just different than what you say?

Remember AMD only tests retail chips (they don't make engineering samples anymore apparently) and that non 'R5' 2600 with no QR Code is absolutely a retail chip just because AMD likes to make just one CPU in their CPU line be absolutely different than the rest in the chips in the series.

So, CanardPC theorizes that they are justified in using the crappiest motherboard for testing because of "automatic omnipresent cheats" that boards designed for high core count chips may provide. They theorize that using a proper board will only give about a 1%-2% boost to the scores (i.e...

http://digiworthy.com/2017/12/19/aida64-ryzen-gen-2-cpus/ It appears that this website has seen evidence of the non-existent Pinnacle Ridge CPUs in December. What else we gonna make up Juan?

So where is the proof that AMD didn't test the Piunnacle Ridge CPU's, or is it just more made up 'facts'?