• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

Recent content by chomba

  1. C

    Titan Black 1920x1200 or R9 295X2 2560x1440 for Arma 3 w/ 50+ min fps (v.high/ultra)

    Thanks xoleras and others for your extensive input. It was really helpful and enlightening (e.g. the use of mad AA settings)... except I have to go back to the drawing board. :) At this point, I would prefer the 27" 2560x1440 option. I will have to ruminate on the GPU decision, e.g. two cheaper...
  2. C

    Titan Black 1920x1200 or R9 295X2 2560x1440 for Arma 3 w/ 50+ min fps (v.high/ultra)

    Isn't the overclock benefit between 4770 and 4770K pretty minor though? For example http://www.techspot.com/review/712-arma-3-benchmarks/page5.html the first graph. An estimated couple fps difference between 4770 turbo vs overclocked 4770K @ 4.5 GHz. And the overclocked 4770K at that speed is...
  3. C

    Titan Black 1920x1200 or R9 295X2 2560x1440 for Arma 3 w/ 50+ min fps (v.high/ultra)

    I have to stick to 4770 for some of the features 4770K does not have.
  4. C

    Titan Black 1920x1200 or R9 295X2 2560x1440 for Arma 3 w/ 50+ min fps (v.high/ultra)

    Which setup (and why) would you choose if the following was the goal; run Arma 3 with 50+ min fps using very high or ultra preset: - 1920x1200 24" and Titan Black, - 2560x1440 27" and R9 295X2? From the benchmarks I've seen it looks like that Titan Black alone is not enough for 50+ min fps...
  5. C

    Eizo FlexScan EV2736W

    Could some kind soul check what is the height from your desk/table to the bottom of the screen (bezel) at its lowest position on the stock stand?
  6. C

    24" 1920x1200 sRGB IPS/PLS recommendations

    Thanks for chiming in. I've been to a large IT retail shop and I'm still thinking about my options. I might go with a 2560x1440 instead of the 1920x1200. Looking at one of those (27", Asus PB278Q) I'm a bit concerned about the default size of everything (text, icons, etc.) from viewing distance...
  7. C

    24" 1920x1200 sRGB IPS/PLS recommendations

    I guess I have to drop out some candidates otherwise there will endless back and forth indecision. If I've read & understood correctly: Asus PB248Q - PWM - reports of abnormally high squealing noise during operation and/or when sleeping / in power save mode BenQ BL2411PT - no-PWM...
  8. C

    24" 1920x1200 sRGB IPS/PLS recommendations

    I'm looking for a 24" 1920x1200 sRGB IPS/PLS display that satisfies the requirements listed below. I've been drowning myself in reviews and forums and just when I feel this display is it some comment sways me to another direction. Rewarding and frustrating at the same time. I would really...
See more
Back
Top