d3athf1sh
[H]ard|Gawd
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2015
- Messages
- 1,437
like with windows 11 literally, this october, microsoft is literally producing largest amount of e-waste in the history of the world by making 90% of compatible devices, incompatible with their new OS. why wouldn't they not take that opportunity to replace the file system and anything else that's antiquated? what a dumb farkin move. if you ask me, i'm gonna tell you to "never do anything halfass". but it really makes no difference to me. i've gone linux. and i absolutely hate Bill Gates, what a garbage human.Does de bloating windows magically replace NTFS?
but really we know why this is going down like it is. if you remember correctly, win 10 was suppose to be the last version of windows and was just going to be continually upgraded from there, similar to OSX. but then AMD started beating Intel and taking marketshare. and instead of just "updating the scheduler", i'm guessing intel paid them a large chunk of money to write a whole new OS to take advantage of their new architecture (big little). man can you imagine the world we'd be living in right now if MS would've wrote a whole new OS to take advantage of AMD's piledriver+++ multithreaded architecture instead of just keeping everything including games to only work with dual-quad cores? i mean there are games now that won't run on systems with more than 4 cores and you have to use workarounds to play them. not to mention that AMD got sued for them "technically not having 8 cores" when technically they did for most workloads, basically hardware hyper-threading. and now i look in trade magazines and see say laptops advertised as having "10 cores!" when really it's just the same old quad core with 6 "e cores"? how the f*** is that any better? that's not 10 "real cores". not to mention they're still pushing those trash 12-14th gen with their degradation problems. those should've all been recalled. but hey i guess that's the world we live in.