Comixbooks
Fully [H]
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2008
- Messages
- 22,023
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
or...... you get a wall mount "vacuum" that vaporizes dust with a laser automatically.Doesn't it get to the point of maxing it out? Its a vacuum. It sucks up things off the carpet. I feel like we're trying to improve the toilet plunger here.
Maybe. I have a Dyson V11 Animal. Wonderful little thing, just wish 'boost' didn't suck up so much battery. You will be surprised how much shit comes out of the carpets in boost mode.Doesn't it get to the point of maxing it out? Its a vacuum. It sucks up things off the carpet. I feel like we're trying to improve the toilet plunger here.
Doesn't it get to the point of maxing it out? Its a vacuum. It sucks up things off the carpet. I feel like we're trying to improve the toilet plunger here.
Queue Gen Z griping on facebook about how poor they are with a 400 dollar fan and 1500 dollar vacuum in the background.Geez. I can't imagine how much more expansive these will be over their normal expensive vacuums.
No, but they'll be able to sell it to gullible yuppies for an extra $100.The laser on this product does exactly nothing. The product itself will most likely not use any special motors either.
The laser on this product does exactly nothing. The product itself will most likely not use any special motors either. Last one of these I saw used a Panasonic off the shelf motor.
cdabc123 Vaporizing dust produces... well dust. Sure eventually you might be able to reduce it to just heat but at that point its probably not good to be in the room.
Geez. I can't imagine how much more expansive these will be over their normal expensive vacuums.
I got a refub V11, I refuse to spend $600 on a vacuum. But you want to talk overpriced? Filter Queen. My mother still has a 1978 Filter Queen Model 31 that she uses. She said she paid $1200 back in 78 and look at them now $3,398.00 for one. I don't see how they are worth that much either. There not much that has changed in 40+ years.Have a V6 cordless for close on 3 years now. can't use the boost mode as it kills the battery, but I think thats the battery at fault.
I kinda like them, but they are overpriced
There is no such thing for consumer level products. No dyson product is fanless. They just put the fans into a cowl and tell people its fanless.I always thought the blade less fans were slick as fuck.
Not worth the price though.
Acktually... it would create a gas, assuming that the laser could heat the incoming matter stream to a hot enough temperature. More likely is that there would be a tiny fraction that was not vaporized and would need to be dumped out (AKA ash). Of course the main concern with this approach would be the kind of gasses produced from the vaporization cycle and their affect on people living in a confined space.Vaporizing dust produces... well dust.
Shows how much I looked into it after I saw the price tag. Normal box and oscillating fans just keep chugging alongThere is no such thing for consumer level products. No dyson product is fanless. They just put the fans into a cowl and tell people its fanless.
They really are. A marketing company that happens to sell vacuums.Oh Dyson....the apple of the cleaning world.
My mother still has a 1978 Filter Queen Model 31 that she uses. She said she paid $1200 back in 78 and look at them now $3,398.00 for one. I don't see how they are worth that much either. There not much that has changed in 40+ years.
They really are. A marketing company that happens to sell vacuums.
And it sickens me the way I now need a vacuum with an LCD and realtime graphs of the different sized dust molecules that have been collected, alphabetized, "coin-sorted" into groups, tagged and dated; the full analysis of which I can download as a CSV from the DysonCloud with a $29.95 subscription. /wrists
View attachment 344252
its bladeless, not fanless, its a fan. The principle of the design is pretty neat actually. It has something more akin to a centrifugal compressor inside. But yea, its not more effective at cooling me down than the $19 rattle cage fan from walmart.There is no such thing for consumer level products. No dyson product is fanless. They just put the fans into a cowl and tell people its fanless.
I like the old school way of cataloging the filth that my Dyson picks up, it's a mostly transparent cup that is right below the motor, and I just look in there to see how much stuff it picked up no subscription necessary!They really are. A marketing company that happens to sell vacuums.
And it sickens me the way I now need a vacuum with an LCD and realtime graphs of the different sized dust molecules that have been collected, alphabetized, "coin-sorted" into groups, tagged and dated; the full analysis of which I can download as a CSV from the DysonCloud with a $29.95 subscription. /wrists
View attachment 344252
It's marketing.its bladeless, not fanless, its a fan. The principle of the design is pretty neat actually. It has something more akin to a centrifugal compressor inside. But yea, its not more effective at cooling me down than the $19 rattle cage fan from walmart.
I have my DC25 for over 10 years, not one part has broken on it, and it still performs like it did day one.
Thats not exactly true. They call it an air multiplyer, where you get more actual air flow by speeding up a thin sheet of air in a ring, then propelling it into still air. It makes the still air move as well. Its actually pretty neat engineering. But like I said, you can just put a bigger motor on a bladed fan and achieve the same result for considerably less input.It's marketing.
The design is a known effect. Hell we knew how to build cowls in the 50s-60s. Any properly done cowled asymmetric fan design would exceed or match the energy efficiency per CFM and give similar noise levels. The reason you don't see asymetric fans for retail sale is they require a decent bit of engineering and most people don't want to spend that kind of coin for a fan.
There is nothing neat or new about it. Most of dysons new products are just a fancy plastic shell surrounding off the shelf products. Almost all of their newer fans contain Panasonic motors not any special "digital" design.
We have one and it is pretty nice. Though I got the one with the heater in it too so the dual mode is nice. But got it refurbed so it was sub $200 at the time, been using it for 3-4 years now i think.its bladeless, not fanless, its a fan. The principle of the design is pretty neat actually. It has something more akin to a centrifugal compressor inside. But yea, its not more effective at cooling me down than the $19 rattle cage fan from walmart.
That is an utter bullsh*t marketing statement that physics promptly says no to. Think of air like a swimming pool. Pumping water through a ring in a swimming pool does not magically move more water compared to simple surface area of a fan.Thats not exactly true. They call it an air multiplyer, where you get more actual air flow by speeding up a thin sheet of air in a ring, then propelling it into still air. It makes the still air move as well. Its actually pretty neat engineering. But like I said, you can just put a bigger motor on a bladed fan and achieve the same result for considerably less input.
Actually the physics is the only interesting thing, and it does not say no. Yes, pumping a high velocity stream of water through a ring in a swiming pool will induce a current through the centre of that ring. Dyson makes some weird shit, and its super expensive. I own no Dyson things. But the engineering is cool.That is an utter bullsh*t marketing statement that physics promptly says no to. Think of air like a swimming pool. Pumping water through a ring in a swimming pool does not magically move more water compared to simple surface area of a fan.
Stop shitting on the carpets...Maybe. I have a Dyson V11 Animal. Wonderful little thing, just wish 'boost' didn't suck up so much battery. You will be surprised how much shit comes out of the carpets in boost mode.