Plague_Injected
Supreme [H]ardness
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2008
- Messages
- 6,621
Console gamers now have an opportunity at exercising empathy for PC gamers who have been experiencing this bullshit for a long time.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Where is the evidence of that? You can hardly base a controversy around a supposition.
Just picked up Brotherhood Ass Creed first game I ever played of the series only was 5.00 on steam.
Why do you need evidence around here anymore. It is just another excuse for the neck beards to hate on Microsoft, never mind that the CPU in the X1 is faster than the PS4 CPU which means in this case it is the X1 being held back.
This isn't a graphics issue they said its the massive amount of npcs both systems are limited in that aspect vs any PC CPU. So they are locking in the game on both so that no compromise in the games world interaction and stays the same. How god damn hard is this to understand. Its about resources.
Obviously PC will be the prettiest they simply want no actual game play compromise what good would 1080p be on ps4 if they had to lower the in world interaction just for your precious P's.
Want 1080p or better with 60fps or higher play PC neither console is capable with the world size and amount of npcs they've been showing its way more than any of their other games even watchdogs.
Which is why this game is current gen and PC only.
Ubisoft must have added some very complex A.I. then....im doubting that
hey have said the mob is very interactive in unity. Haven't you guys watched any videos on the game or are we just 900p raging?
They've shown random in mobs interacting during fights and the amount of npcs is massive compared to previous games.
there have been tons of NPC's in all previous AC games (the last few in particular) so I don't know how much bigger they can make it...
For this gen it seems to be very true. Post release even for a few games, which is absurd really."A game’s final resolution isn’t set until late in the development cycle"
is that true for most games?
"A games final resolution isnt set until late in the development cycle"
is that true for most games?
1.6ghz vs 1.75ghz is not enough of a bump to justify this. The PS4 has the better GPU so its still the X1 holding back
If it was just a clock speed difference, I'd agree with you. But it isn't just a clock speed difference.1.6ghz vs 1.75ghz is not enough of a bump to justify this. The PS4 has the better GPU so its still the X1 holding back
Its a clear parity enforcement thing. Ubisoft doesn't want show favor towards either console so it announces this nonsense and ends up looking even worse.
The Xbox One is a great system but its underpowered. The PS4 is a great system and can do 1080p most of the time but it is also underpowered.
Gamers got the short end of the stick this generation with companies more concerned about immediate profit relief than consoles with actual muscle.
I think you can blame Ubisoft , Microsoft and Sony equally for this clusterfuck. This type of behavior is driving people by the bus load to PCs where this parity nonsense is nonexistent.
Bought Alien : Isolation for the PS4 expecting 1080p 60 , instead I get 1080p 30 and choppy cut scenes. Go over my friends house and see him playing at 4k at 30 with no choppy cut scenes. Its clear what the winner is this generation and it isn't us gamers.
Very true, all of which you speak.
When they start gimping PC games to enforce parity then gamers are indeed dead.
is there really any noticeable difference in image quality between 900p and 1080p?...I understand where Ubisoft is coming from...PS4 shouldn't have been gimped but overall I don't think anyone on consoles will notice...
Where does it end, though? PC's are starting to get the shaft so that gamers don't see a lot of difference between PC and consoles.
Neither should be gimped. Give the best performance on every platform. If it's 1080P, that's it. If it's 900p (or 720p), then that's it. Let the consumer buy the better version. It's always been like that. SNES and Genesis had similar issues with games. One looked better than the other. No one cried about it. That's just the way it was. Same with today's consoles. There is no reason to buy one over the other if this is the way it's going to be. They are developing for the low powered one, so there is no reason to buy the higher powered one.
If Microsoft is paying for this to happen, it needs to be exposed and Microsoft will get the shaft from many gamers.
I have a feeling its behind the door dealings. Developers didnt seem to have a problem with not gimping the 360's version compared to ps3 last gen for any multiplat. Why now? I smell something fishy.
Either behind the door dealings or just very lazy and trying to cheat costs.
except the fact that its not Microsoft. People always look to blame Microsoft for all kinds of shit that isnt their doing. If that was the case you would see it on more games than it happens. Lazy devs are lazy devs
except the fact that its not Microsoft. People alwas look to blame Microsoft for all kinds of shit that isnt their doing. If thats the case you would see it on more games than it happens. Lazy devs are lazy devs
It's not ONLY Microsoft, but lately it's *mostly* Microsoft because theyre so behind in the console race. Incredibly naive if you think its "lazy devs" rather than the publisher getting pressured and/or moneyhatted to maintain closer platform parity since the Xbone cant compete on specs or performance and every review on a new gen multiplat game mentions the performance and resolution disparity.
Just ask yourself who has the most to gain by publishers being pressured to artificially limit perfomance to the lowest common denominator. This isnt rocket science. MS is stuck and cant compete on hardware so now theyre trying to change the conversation in an attempt to compete on perception.
Why is it not occuring with other games? Why is it games like the first assassins creed came with a Day 1 patch to increase res on PS4 to 1080P coming FROM THE SAME PUBLISHER. This is not a Microsoft money hat, plain and simple. If you want to blame them you can blame them, just know that its utter BS
A lot can change in a year.
Not even GAF is blaming microsoft on this one lol. Its idiotic to blame a console maker for a devs decision. This happens to PC ports all the fucking time but you dont see people blaming the PS4 and Sony for that one do you? The blame lands on the publisher and the dev, they made the decision
Considering that MS has an Assassin Creed Unity xbone bundle deal I don't think that's very far fetched.. So, yes, in this situation I blame MS for making this happen and equally I blame Ubi for agreeing to this. Also, with MS having a parity business model for indie developers I see how that idea could stretch over to 3rd party deals with big publishers.
I find it funny that someone with several degrees always uses the wrong version of your/you're...The parity has NOTHING TO DO WITH TECHNICAL SPECS. It has to do with release date, and content. Your reaching.
Every single person just wants to find whatever reason they can to bash microsoft. Nevermind the fact that Sony is a failing company for a reason, Sony is not the godsend that everyone is trying to make them out to be. Its getting out of hand and makes every single board the exact same thing. Seriously, this is 100% on the dev. If it was microsoft it would be happening more often, but it isnt.
The last console generation didn't have as many hardware similarities between them as the current one. To get the game running on both a PS3 and 360 it had to be developed and optimized separately. Now that the architecture is nearly the same between PS4 and XB1 it is not necessary to develop an entirely different version. They can save money by developing for the lowest common denominator and then you ensure it can run on every other platform.I don't remember Ubisoft gimping the PS3 version to match 360.
Apparently Ubisoft's loyalties are now seen.
I find it funny that someone with several degrees always uses the wrong version of your/you're...
I can respect that . Can't always go against the will of our robotic overlords.Work filters block the site which means every reply i type is done on a phone, and my dictionary automatically replaces youre with your due to the lack of an apostrophe. Suppose i could just turn off auto correct but that introduces even bigger problems
The parity has NOTHING TO DO WITH TECHNICAL SPECS.