Tiger Attack Victim Caught Shoplifting

Terry Olaes

I Used to be the [H] News Guy
2FA
Joined
Nov 27, 2006
Messages
4,646
One of the survivors of the San Francisco Zoo Tiger Attack on Christmas Day was arrested on Friday for trying to steal a pair of Wii Remotes that he hid in his pants. The kicker is that he was busted after filing a lawsuit with his brothers against the City of San Francisco seeking monetary damages for the tiger attack. Nice.

Paul Dhaliwal, 19, reportedly concealed two Wii Remotes in his pants. An undercover security officer witnessed the theft and followed Dhaliwal to the cash registers, where he never made an attempt to pay for the items.
 
I guess he's now diasbled, just not so disabled he can get out there and shoplift. Hmm, wonder how the jury will discount his 5 finger discount when it comes to taking $$ out of thier tax base.

Not to mention, the assholes were taunting happy tiger funball and deserved what they got.... evolution is alive and well and...

TOO STUPID TOO LIVE AND DIDN'T STILL RULES. :eek::rolleyes::p
 
Hmmm, I wonder if anyone should really believe these two that they didn't tease that Tiger?
 
Who cares?



I guess this is tech related news....?



tough crowd or what? would you rather have an exerpt from a textbook or something? the article's an interesting read + relates to technology, however grazing a blow.


personally, i don't think their lawsuit regarding the tiger attack should be affected by this petty crime. a tiger still did some attacking, no matter how many stolen wii remotes buddy chooses to dump in his pantaloons.
 
personally, i don't think their lawsuit regarding the tiger attack should be affected by this petty crime. a tiger still did some attacking, no matter how many stolen wii remotes buddy chooses to dump in his pantaloons.

What about his other crimes? It's further proof that the guy is a lying asshole, who's story shouldn't be believed. You mess with the bull, you get the horns.
 
The tiger should NOT be able to leave the enclosed area no matter what anyone does to it.
I think a gate controlled by some sort of 'taunt-o-meter' is acceptable. As someone raises the meter by taunting the large, naturally predatory animal, the gate slowly raises. After a certain threshold, mauling is guaranteed!

We need more mechanisms to weed out less-than-acceptable human beings in this modern age. I wish only that the tiger could have done more damage.
 
The tiger should NOT be able to leave the enclosed area no matter what anyone does to it.

That enclosure was really old, something like 60 years old if I remember correctly. It kept tigers from getting out for 60 years.
 
The tiger should NOT be able to leave the enclosed area no matter what anyone does to it.
Agreed. As a local I can tell you this was in the papers a lot. It's a mixed bag. On One hand the wall was a full 6'-7' shorter than the Zoo claimed it was an and well below the safety standard for large cat enclosures. That clearly and rightfully means the Zoo is going to have to pay something.

The sad part is you could not find less deserving plaintiffs. The fact is these three got drunk, smoked dope and then went to the Zoo to fuck off and the two plantiffs were seen harassing the other large cats in the feeding area just 20-30 minutes prior while the one that died appologized for their behavoir only to become a snack to a Tatiana (the tiger that was killed). The said thing is the of the three, the one that died was apparently the good kid in the group. Nature has a way of skipping over the shit heads and going right for the only one with an once of decency.

On the other hand I completely disagree with your point. Folks that fuck with wild animals deserve to get zapped. Just as I have no sympathy for folks that run on hiking trails in the foothills and then get killed by a cougar. Let's see, you are in their territory and running like pray, sounds justified to me.
 
Agreed. As a local I can tell you this was in the papers a lot. It's a mixed bag. On One hand the wall was a full 6'-7' shorter than the Zoo claimed it was an and well below the safety standard for large cat enclosures.
Ignore those early reports.

The reality is that there are no concrete rules, I repeat NO CONCRETE RULES, for the exact measurements for what is 'high enough'. The 'recommended height' is relatively new by the standards of most zoos in the country.

The wall was high enough for 6 decades.
On the other hand I completely disagree with your point. Folks that fuck with wild animals deserve to get zapped. Just as I have no sympathy for folks that run on hiking trails in the foothills and then get killed by a cougar. Let's see, you are in their territory and running like pray, sounds justified to me.
I agree 200%.
 
If I remember correctly the idiot who died was dangling his leg in the enclosure and the tiger climbed up it.
 
The only sad part is that the Tiger was shot. There should have been three gunshots that day. One that put that dying loser out of his misery and two more for his shitbird buddies.
 
The only sad part is that the Tiger was shot. There should have been three gunshots that day. One that put that dying loser out of his misery and two more for his shitbird buddies.

Another sad thing is tiger didn't finish the job on these two knuckleheads. These two retards do not deserve to get paid.
 
Being on the endangered species list... that tiger was worth more to the world than these asshats who will do nothing but TAKE from anyone and everyone around them. As they always have it seems. Poor Tatiana... you deserved better.
 
tough crowd or what? would you rather have an exerpt from a textbook or something? the article's an interesting read + relates to technology, however grazing a blow.


personally, i don't think their lawsuit regarding the tiger attack should be affected by this petty crime. a tiger still did some attacking, no matter how many stolen wii remotes buddy chooses to dump in his pantaloons.

Tough crowd? Nah! We just don't have any tolerance for scum bag people.
 
I think a gate controlled by some sort of 'taunt-o-meter' is acceptable. As someone raises the meter by taunting the large, naturally predatory animal, the gate slowly raises. After a certain threshold, mauling is guaranteed!

We need more mechanisms to weed out less-than-acceptable human beings in this modern age. I wish only that the tiger could have done more damage.

Actually I think it should lower as you stupidly taunt an 800 pound cat, not raise. But that's just me.
 
poor tiger, should have killed off these losers and left the tiger alone
 
Yea they taunted a tiger but it shouldn't have been unable to escape the cage, no matter what. It's not like they went up to a tiger in the wild and started fucking with it. Honestly, I don't care if the animal died. It's just an animal. The kid's obnoxiousness is not what should be called into question, but the zoos lack of judgment on the wall height.

Actually I think it should lower as you stupidly taunt an 800 pound cat, not raise. But that's just me.

There is a difference between gates and walls, fyi. Gates would raise or swing open to allow access, walls would lower.

Just as I have no sympathy for folks that run on hiking trails in the foothills and then get killed by a cougar. Let's see, you are in their territory and running like pray, sounds justified to me.

I never knew prey jogged around on hiking trails! And here I was thinking prey animals would try to avoid being highly conspicuous and noisy to avoid predators. Learn something new everyday I guess. :rolleyes:
 
..I never knew prey jogged around on hiking trails! And here I was thinking prey animals would try to avoid being highly conspicuous and noisy to avoid predators. Learn something new everyday I guess. :rolleyes:
Obviously you have never delt with stalking animals or even a vicious dog. Running is the last thing you do as it is too similar to prey behavior. So to go into the wild and to behave like prey is just asking for trouble. It's just arrogant. When you go into the woods you need to respect nature and understand the dangers. Its no different than jackasses that ride motorcycles drunk without a helmet and a girl in a bikini on the back...taking stupid risks negates my sympathy for their potentially tragic results.
 
Yea they taunted a tiger but it shouldn't have been unable to escape the cage, no matter what. It's not like they went up to a tiger in the wild and started fucking with it. Honestly, I don't care if the animal died. It's just an animal. The kid's obnoxiousness is not what should be called into question, but the zoos lack of judgment on the wall height.



There is a difference between gates and walls, fyi. Gates would raise or swing open to allow access, walls would lower.



I never knew prey jogged around on hiking trails! And here I was thinking prey animals would try to avoid being highly conspicuous and noisy to avoid predators. Learn something new everyday I guess. :rolleyes:

Nice attitude. In case you missed the memo, you're a mammal too, and thus an animal. So were the morons at the zoo.
 
Obviously you have never delt with stalking animals or even a vicious dog. Running is the last thing you do as it is too similar to prey behavior. So to go into the wild and to behave like prey is just asking for trouble. It's just arrogant. When you go into the woods you need to respect nature and understand the dangers. Its no different than jackasses that ride motorcycles drunk without a helmet and a girl in a bikini on the back...taking stupid risks negates my sympathy for their potentially tragic results.

The point is no animal runs around a damn trail without a reason. Prey runs after it is chased. You running towards, and past, a predatory animal, with zero provocation, in no way whatsoever mimics animal behavior. Your analogy sucks and is the equivalent of saying, "because animals breathe, and so do you, you're like an animal".

Nice attitude. In case you missed the memo, you're a mammal too, and thus an animal. So were the morons at the zoo.

Unlike you, I am able to distinguish the striking dissimilarities between animals, with their limited ability and brainpower, and the homosapien's vastly superior intellect and adaptability. Just because a bird can build a nest out of twigs doesn't mean it is even remotely close to building cities. We dominated nature due to the fact that we are not simply animals.
 
Not to mention, the assholes were taunting happy tiger funball and deserved what they got.... evolution is alive and well and...

That's pretty much retarded.... since when do people at the zoo have to play by the animals rules?
Fact is, anything could've set that tiger off. A crying baby could have caused it to snap the same way.... then of course you could go blame the baby for crying and setting the tiger off... or we could pull our heads out of our asses and lay blame on the zoo for not keeping animal from human
 
That's pretty much retarded.... since when do people at the zoo have to play by the animals rules?

You'd have a point if the idiots weren't breaking the Zoo's rules.
Fact is, anything could've set that tiger off.
I'll stop you there.

What set the animal off was 2 of the 3 idiots taunting it and placing themselves within the realms of danger, for a few shits and giggles.

It wasn't a baby crying, it wasn't taxes, it wasn't Buck Rogers.

It was a couple of Darwin Candidates.
 
Heh, the day this happened (tiger mauling), I could see this coming like slow train wreck. These kids are obviously trouble makers, this just proves that.
 
He must have just felt invincible after being attacked by a Tiger.

Pretty logical, if I say so myself.
 
Idiots taunt tiger, tiger is NOT in an impenatrable prison, tiger gets motivated enough to bother trying to escape, tiger succeeds....

TIGER GUTS THEM, LIKE A FUCKING PIG :eek::rolleyes::p

Seems like all is one with the universe and the pinnacle predator did exactly what it is designed to do... KILL the weak and stupid.

The only thing RETARDED about any of that is the 3 idiots. :D
 
I formally here decree that we insitute a new amendment to our laws.

Sparta Act of 2009

I. All towns and cities in the 50 States shall now be required to make a huge bottomless pit in the middle of their establishment to weed out the stupid kids who arent smart enough to not fall into it. Thus weeding out the less fit to survive in society.

II. Children most take a test every 2 years past 6th grade to test common sense, level of ethics and morality, and logic and reasoning skills. If a child shows a lack of competency in any of these categories they shall be emitted a 6 month grace period in which to retake the test. Upon a second failure they shall be kicked into the bottomless pit.

III. Any adult (18+) found doing random stupid acts of barbarousness shall be taken in front of a tribunal to determine their level of civility. Punishments can range from a set amount of time in "rehabilitation" to death by the pit.


I think if the world went by these rules we'd be in a much better place filled with less idiots doing stupid things like fucking with a f'ing tiger and then being surprised when it decides to fuck you right back.
 
The point is no animal runs around a damn trail without a reason. Prey runs after it is chased. You running towards, and past, a predatory animal, with zero provocation, in no way whatsoever mimics animal behavior. Your analogy sucks and is the equivalent of saying, "because animals breathe, and so do you, you're like an animal".

I'm guessing you don't live anywhere near where animals wander save a zoo yes? Animals wander trails much like humans do, (both prey and predator,) for the same reasons humans do, easier to navigate. Predators hide, (kinda how they end up actually catching food,) so if someone runs by that is provocation. Humans have removed themselves from the food chain, (or more specifically put themselves outside of it but still take from it,) then there is an up-roar when an animal ends up snacking on someone. To a predator like a big cat, humans don’t look a hell of a lot different from a deer… your just lunch on 2 legs…

Regardless of how you want to look at it we are animals; and a few thousand years ago we were in the food chain; humans managed to pull themselves out of that circle as it were not so much by the ‘vastly superior intelligence’ and more for their ability to grow a finger in another direction… The opposable thumb is thought by many scientists to have been the primary catalyst to the evolution of man.


Unlike you, I am able to distinguish the striking dissimilarities between animals, with their limited ability and brainpower, and the homosapien's vastly superior intellect and adaptability. Just because a bird can build a nest out of twigs doesn't mean it is even remotely close to building cities. We dominated nature due to the fact that we are not simply animals.

We dominate nature because we can hold sticks, swords, guns etc… Beyond that I’ve known many people, (these three dip-shits inclusive,) that obviously aren’t smarter than animals…one was a snack after all….

Your mindset only encompasses the superiority complex that many people currently have, ‘I think there fore I am better than anything else on this planet’. Take that superior intellect of yours, wander out into the woods for a few weeks, (sans tools,) and tell me how well you do at surviving… while at the same times animals have learned to adapt and survive not only in their world but in the human world as well… food for thought.
 
The point is no animal runs around a damn trail without a reason. Prey runs after it is chased. You running towards, and past, a predatory animal, with zero provocation, in no way whatsoever mimics animal behavior. Your analogy sucks and is the equivalent of saying, "because animals breathe, and so do you, you're like an animal"...
You obviously have no clue what you are talking about. Its not an analogy, its a simple fact. It is the same reason why when confronted by a vicious dog you never turn your back and run unless you are absolutely sure you can out run them because the act of running mimics prey behavior. Yes predators normally avoid humans but when humans enter their environment and are not aware of their surroundings and act like prey people create the problem. Faulting a cougar for being a cougar is just silly. I know you don’t like to hear you are on the food chain but when you go into the woods you are. Try telling a Grizzly Bear that because you are inconspicuous human talking loudly, listening to your iPod while hiking alone that it shouldn’t be attacking you when you surprise it turning a bend.

I know it maybe tough for a city kid like yourself to hear but you need to respect the wild a little or don't cry when you get bit.
 
Wow, guys, wow. This thread has gotten ridiculous. I lost track of the argument... Joggers shoplift? Cougars eat iPods? Oh shit, I got it, cougars shoplift iPods to eat them.

Tragedy all around. The "victims" are schmucks. No question. However, the tiger should not have been able to make it out of the enclosure.

*

As for the bottomless pit idea, how about just a deep hole with a couple of tigers in it?
 
You obviously have no clue what you are talking about. Its not an analogy, its a simple fact. It is the same reason why when confronted by a vicious dog you never turn your back and run unless you are absolutely sure you can out run them because the act of running mimics prey behavior. Yes predators normally avoid humans but when humans enter their environment and are not aware of their surroundings and act like prey people create the problem. Faulting a cougar for being a cougar is just silly. I know you don’t like to hear you are on the food chain but when you go into the woods you are. Try telling a Grizzly Bear that because you are inconspicuous human talking loudly, listening to your iPod while hiking alone that it shouldn’t be attacking you when you surprise it turning a bend.

I know it maybe tough for a city kid like yourself to hear but you need to respect the wild a little or don't cry when you get bit.

I'm guessing you don't live anywhere near where animals wander save a zoo yes? Animals wander trails much like humans do, (both prey and predator,) for the same reasons humans do, easier to navigate. Predators hide, (kinda how they end up actually catching food,) so if someone runs by that is provocation. Humans have removed themselves from the food chain, (or more specifically put themselves outside of it but still take from it,) then there is an up-roar when an animal ends up snacking on someone. To a predator like a big cat, humans don’t look a hell of a lot different from a deer… your just lunch on 2 legs…

I'll say it again since you are apparently too dense to understand. No animals run along trails for fun. They would only run after being chased. Name me one god damned animal that runs along trails for the fun of it please. When you fail to find a suitable candidate that runs cardio in the woods, I'll be waiting for your admission that you do not know how to keep from taking thing out of context for the sake of arguing.

I argued that running along trails does not mimic running from prey. Being loud and jogging noisily along a path does not in any way mimic an animal fleeing from a predator that has just attacked them. The attack has to happen first, you see?

I never said animals never run...:rolleyes:

Regardless of how you want to look at it we are animals; and a few thousand years ago we were in the food chain; humans managed to pull themselves out of that circle as it were not so much by the ‘vastly superior intelligence’ and more for their ability to grow a finger in another direction… The opposable thumb is thought by many scientists to have been the primary catalyst to the evolution of man.




We dominate nature because we can hold sticks, swords, guns etc… Beyond that I’ve known many people, (these three dip-shits inclusive,) that obviously aren’t smarter than animals…one was a snack after all….

Your mindset only encompasses the superiority complex that many people currently have, ‘I think there fore I am better than anything else on this planet’. Take that superior intellect of yours, wander out into the woods for a few weeks, (sans tools,) and tell me how well you do at surviving… while at the same times animals have learned to adapt and survive not only in their world but in the human world as well… food for thought.

Many types of primates have thumbs too yet we dominate them all as well. We do it through our superior intellect. Plain and simple. Whether that intellect happened by chance or not is irrelevant.

And it's funny how you call me city boy when I'm the one who grew up hunting and fishing my whole life. Do you feel special when you pretend to be a Navajo?
 
Back
Top