![[H]ard|Forum](/styles/hardforum/xenforo/logo_dark.png){kind=logo}
Even if the X1900 isn't the unstoppable beast that everyone was expecting, you have to at least concede that it hasn't been a bad launch for ATI. For the first time since the 9800XT, ATI clearly has the performance crown over Nvidia (even if it's only for a month or two). And to think that most people were saying a few months ago that ATI would be going bankrupt.
I also liked [H]ard's review. Although a few months ago people were whining that [H]ardOCP had something against ATI, and I feel that there was a slight hint of overcompensation in this review (perhaps making the X1900 launch sound slightly better than it really was). The review certainly wasn't slandered by any means, I just don't want to see [H]ard become "soft" like the other review sites out there and start going easy on the companies of the products that they review.
I also liked [H]ard's review. Although a few months ago people were whining that [H]ardOCP had something against ATI, and I feel that there was a slight hint of overcompensation in this review (perhaps making the X1900 launch sound slightly better than it really was). The review certainly wasn't slandered by any means, I just don't want to see [H]ard become "soft" like the other review sites out there and start going easy on the companies of the products that they review.