Which 4000+ Core OC's better?

[Bloodgod42]

Im getting a AMD 64 4000+ this weekend and I would like to be able to OC it to 3.0Ghz with water-cooling.

My question is: Which of the (2) 4000+ cores, the 90nm 1.35V San Diego or the 0.13µm 1.5V Clawhammer, are better for OC?

There is only $1 price difference, but I have a feeling the OC potential of one might be greater. Or perhaps not...please tell me.

Thanks for your input!
Happy OC'ing!!

Bloodgod42

 

[Absolute0]

San Diego by a long shot

 

[Bloodgod42]

San Diego by a long shot

Right on, I appreciate the input!

Can you tell me what makes it better than the other?

Thanks again,
Bloodgod42

 

[Absolute0]

90nm manufacturing process gives it more overclocking capacity, while using less energy, then the larger 130nm manufacturing process. Basically it's built more efficiently.

 

[YARDofSTUF]

San Diego also has SSE3

 

[N H O]

San Diego also has SSE3

and runs cooler

 

[Bloodgod42]

Great info people!

Thanks everyone for helping me get the right cpu for my new build.
I'll keep you updated.

Bloodgod42