Title says it all - whenever someone sends me a DCC, I'm no longer able to receive it at blazing speeds. Much rather, any sends I receive are very effectively throttled to 7.5kb/s.
I decided that maybe they were simply throttling a specific port - so I set the DCC sends to be connected on randomized ports between 5000 & 9999. No luck - all incoming DCC's were still being throttled to 7.5kb/s.
I've come to the conclusion that maybe they're using some sort of packet-sniffer/frame detection method to have their networking hardware analyze the packet & decide what rate I should receive the data for that connection.
I say this simply because downloads through other clients are unnaffected, as are downloads of large amounts of data via HTTP or FTP connections. (i.e. I was able to download the latest BF1942 Desert Combat mod yesterday at about 1.3mb/s)
Bottom line: What else might they be doing that I'm not thinking of, and is there a way around that, or the scenario I'm thinking of now? (i.e. program to re-encapsulate the frame headers?)
Thanks in advance to anyone with thoughts/comments/flames/suggestions... help is greatly appreciated - I sure hate leaving all this precious university bandwidth unused.![Wink ;) ;)]()
I decided that maybe they were simply throttling a specific port - so I set the DCC sends to be connected on randomized ports between 5000 & 9999. No luck - all incoming DCC's were still being throttled to 7.5kb/s.
I've come to the conclusion that maybe they're using some sort of packet-sniffer/frame detection method to have their networking hardware analyze the packet & decide what rate I should receive the data for that connection.
I say this simply because downloads through other clients are unnaffected, as are downloads of large amounts of data via HTTP or FTP connections. (i.e. I was able to download the latest BF1942 Desert Combat mod yesterday at about 1.3mb/s)
Bottom line: What else might they be doing that I'm not thinking of, and is there a way around that, or the scenario I'm thinking of now? (i.e. program to re-encapsulate the frame headers?)
Thanks in advance to anyone with thoughts/comments/flames/suggestions... help is greatly appreciated - I sure hate leaving all this precious university bandwidth unused.