CleanSlate
Supreme [H]ardness
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2003
- Messages
- 5,263
I heard this today, I am unsure what to think but it makes sense in this example:
2.53 ghz p4 w/ an onboard intel POS gfx card
VS
my 2200+ << clocked 2600+ barton with a 4x agp gf 2 gts (see sig)
Game: www.wulfram.com
Results(software mode only):
2.53 gets a higher peak fps but in battles the fps drops to 30-40 from 85 or higher. The drop in fps causes major system laggage and my aim goes all to hell.
Yet with my 2200+ my fps peaks lower at about 80 fps but stays constant 60+ fps in full all out combat with no real laggage caused by the fps.
Are my findings accurate as the only thing I can think of is that my 350 mhz ramdac on my gf2 gts is owning the pos intel onboard gfx card's ramdac (if it even has one?).
~Adam
2.53 ghz p4 w/ an onboard intel POS gfx card
VS
my 2200+ << clocked 2600+ barton with a 4x agp gf 2 gts (see sig)
Game: www.wulfram.com
Results(software mode only):
2.53 gets a higher peak fps but in battles the fps drops to 30-40 from 85 or higher. The drop in fps causes major system laggage and my aim goes all to hell.
Yet with my 2200+ my fps peaks lower at about 80 fps but stays constant 60+ fps in full all out combat with no real laggage caused by the fps.
Are my findings accurate as the only thing I can think of is that my 350 mhz ramdac on my gf2 gts is owning the pos intel onboard gfx card's ramdac (if it even has one?).
~Adam