I have two networks:
Site A: 10.10.5.0/24 (cisco pix 501)
Site B: 192.168.30.0/24 (cisco asa 5510)
Between site A and B, there exisits a site to site IPSEC tunnel. There are no ACL restrictions on the IPSEC tunnel.
I know have VPN users connecting to Site B.
VPN Users: 172.168.1.0/24
Ideally, what i want to do is have is to have each VPN user that tunnels into site B to be able to reach resources in Site A over the site to site IPSEC tunnel. The client VPN traffic could be NAT'ed to a 192.168.30.0 IP or have the pix perform a NO NAT. Either way, is this possible? Site A uses a Cisco PIX 501 and Site B uses Cisco ASA 5510. The configs might be different, but the concept should be the same if this is indeed possible.
Site A: 10.10.5.0/24 (cisco pix 501)
Site B: 192.168.30.0/24 (cisco asa 5510)
Between site A and B, there exisits a site to site IPSEC tunnel. There are no ACL restrictions on the IPSEC tunnel.
I know have VPN users connecting to Site B.
VPN Users: 172.168.1.0/24
Ideally, what i want to do is have is to have each VPN user that tunnels into site B to be able to reach resources in Site A over the site to site IPSEC tunnel. The client VPN traffic could be NAT'ed to a 192.168.30.0 IP or have the pix perform a NO NAT. Either way, is this possible? Site A uses a Cisco PIX 501 and Site B uses Cisco ASA 5510. The configs might be different, but the concept should be the same if this is indeed possible.