• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

quick question...

umcpgrad

2[H]4U
Joined
Apr 2, 2004
Messages
2,800
is it better to get a p4 630 ht tech 3.0ghz

or p4 D 820 dual core tech 2.8

and dual core 820 costs about 120 dollars more

and 820 has 64x bit support? is that right?? and the 630 doesn't? :confused:
 
yes, they both got the 64x extension, however unless your running tons of heavy programs at a time, stick with a 630(then o/c it), the D830 is about to be a thing of the past.
 
when did p4 starting doing 64bit support? :eek: :confused:
wow I am so behind the readings on intel....

:(
 
umcpgrad said:
is it better to get a p4 630 ht tech 3.0ghz

or p4 D 820 dual core tech 2.8

and dual core 820 costs about 120 dollars more

and 820 has 64x bit support? is that right?? and the 630 doesn't? :confused:

Lolz first of all the 600 series p4 is a 64bit chips, performance wise between the 2 chips is minimal, the 820 will perform slightly better.
 
It depends on what you use your CPU for.
If you are just using single-threaded software, like eg games, then the 630 will be slightly faster.
If you are doing heavy multitasking (and I mean heavy, as in two or more CPU-intensive apps, not a webbrowser or mail client or something, that should be handled fine by HT), or if you are using a lot of software optimized for multiprocessing (like audio/video editing/encoding or 3d rendering), then the 820 D is probably the best choice.

I think for most people the 630 would be the better choice.
 
Back
Top