scientificTHEgreat
Limp Gawd
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2003
- Messages
- 240
Opening taken from nvnews.net forums
Hi guys,
i am going to have a Q&A with nVIDIA tomorrow about the nv40. If you have any questions regarding the new chip, please free fell to post them here. I will collect them and then send them over to nvidia.
Thanks for your support!
i thought this was amuzing
Pauls quesitons
1. For the last two years, your main competitiors have done more with less. More performance, better (usable) image quality, less transistors. Indications seem to be that at least some of those elements will play out once again this round - comments?
2. You haven't implemented Low-K on any of your products, and still haven't with NV4x, and you even went as far as to call it dangerous - yet your competitor has had no problems with the process for months now, and have achieved both good yield and excellent performance/heat/cost benefits. Comments?
3. For the last 2 years, your drivers have effectively removed control from the user, instead preferring to force your own "quality" standards upon users. You've consistently cheated in major benchmarks, degraded IQ for speed, and have been "found out" numerous times. Is this going to continue with the NV4x generation, knowing that the enthusiast community will (without doubt) probe deeper into your drivers than ever before?
4. ATi have secured contracts for major consoles, replaced NV in marketshare terms, and have broken many of your major OEM deals - yet you continue to call Intel your main competitor, and dismiss ATi. Do you honestly believe you can reverse this trend?
5. You're not going to answer any of these questions, are you?
Hi guys,
i am going to have a Q&A with nVIDIA tomorrow about the nv40. If you have any questions regarding the new chip, please free fell to post them here. I will collect them and then send them over to nvidia.
Thanks for your support!
i thought this was amuzing
Pauls quesitons
1. For the last two years, your main competitiors have done more with less. More performance, better (usable) image quality, less transistors. Indications seem to be that at least some of those elements will play out once again this round - comments?
2. You haven't implemented Low-K on any of your products, and still haven't with NV4x, and you even went as far as to call it dangerous - yet your competitor has had no problems with the process for months now, and have achieved both good yield and excellent performance/heat/cost benefits. Comments?
3. For the last 2 years, your drivers have effectively removed control from the user, instead preferring to force your own "quality" standards upon users. You've consistently cheated in major benchmarks, degraded IQ for speed, and have been "found out" numerous times. Is this going to continue with the NV4x generation, knowing that the enthusiast community will (without doubt) probe deeper into your drivers than ever before?
4. ATi have secured contracts for major consoles, replaced NV in marketshare terms, and have broken many of your major OEM deals - yet you continue to call Intel your main competitor, and dismiss ATi. Do you honestly believe you can reverse this trend?
5. You're not going to answer any of these questions, are you?