Here's the issue I'm dealing with, cost of overclocking versus cost of buying a faster processor. Here's the scenario I've come up with.
e6300
really high quality ram (team xtreem pc2-8000) to run 1:1 with a 500mhz fsb for an overclock of 3.5ghz
either a p5b-e or p5b deluxe mobo to attain such high clocks
or
e6600
value pc2-6400 ram, as this only needs to run at a lower than default clock of 388mhz to achieve a 3.5ghz overclock
either a regular p5b or p5-e.
The latter came out to be fairly cheaper than the first option. So my question is whether I'm correct or is there some flaw in my design?
e6300
really high quality ram (team xtreem pc2-8000) to run 1:1 with a 500mhz fsb for an overclock of 3.5ghz
either a p5b-e or p5b deluxe mobo to attain such high clocks
or
e6600
value pc2-6400 ram, as this only needs to run at a lower than default clock of 388mhz to achieve a 3.5ghz overclock
either a regular p5b or p5-e.
The latter came out to be fairly cheaper than the first option. So my question is whether I'm correct or is there some flaw in my design?