• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

pump head for 1/4in system

Top Nurse said:
I don't think "head" is a very important topic in a typical closed system for a computer.
"head" is the pump pressure and if it doesnt have enough it wont be able to push through a smaller tubing diameter than its rated for
 
Well that was what I thought as well until someone ran a little experiment with an Eheim pump that they put on the ground and ran a tube up to their 2nd story bedroon computer and it seemed to work just fine with 1/4" tubing. Koolance says that they can have an EXOS up to 10 feet above the computer and it will work just fine.
 
anyway, even if i have to prime the pump first thats no big deal because this is the only 12v pump with any hope of ever fitting inside my exos casing. Its gonna be a kickass mod because we all no that the worst thing about an exos is its horrible flow rate
 
saying that the head is not important to a pump is like saying torque isn't important to an engine.
 
What's wrong with the Swiftech MCP350? It's about the same size as a 60mm case fan.
 
i think ill pass on that pump its bigger has a lower flow rate and is more expensive than the other one
 
cell_491 said:
i think ill pass on that pump its bigger has a lower flow rate and is more expensive than the other one

Peak flow above 0.5gpm (30gph) is irrelevant when talking about a 1/4" system. Pressure head is far more important. You said you wanted pressure head, and the DDC gives that to you in spades over the MAG pump.
 
Cathar said:
Peak flow above 0.5gpm (30gph) is irrelevant when talking about a 1/4" system. Pressure head is far more important. You said you wanted pressure head, and the DDC gives that to you in spades over the MAG pump.
that is very true but im not sure if ill be able to fit the other one in the exos casing
 
1/4"? The pump is the least of your worries ... I recommend seeing a doctor to get your brain checked out.
 
thewhiteguy said:
1/4"? The pump is the least of your worries ... I recommend seeing a doctor to get your brain checked out.
actually there is no performance difference between 1/4in and 1/2in as long as you have a good flow rate
 
wtiger said:
saying that the head is not important to a pump is like saying torque isn't important to an engine.

Torque isn't particulary important in an engine either IF you are already moving. You need torque to accelerate. The same thing is true in a typical water cooled computer closed system because the water isn't being sucked out of a barrel and pushed up into the air. It is being pushed to the top of a circuit where gravity and flow push it back to the pump which pre-loads the pump and allows it to much more easily pump that short distance again and then the cycle repeats itself. :D

So while pump head gives some numbers to compare other pumps with, it doesn't mean a lot. ;)
 
Top Nurse said:
Torque isn't particulary important in an engine either IF you are already moving. You need torque to accelerate. The same thing is true in a typical water cooled computer closed system because the water isn't being sucked out of a barrel and pushed up into the air. It is being pushed to the top of a circuit where gravity and flow push it back to the pump which pre-loads the pump and allows it to much more easily pump that short distance again and then the cycle repeats itself. :D

So while pump head gives some numbers to compare other pumps with, it doesn't mean a lot. ;)

Yes - and while we're at it, we can just blithely discount that friction exists and build ourselves perpetual motion machines too I guess?
 
cell_491 said:
actually there is no performance difference between 1/4in and 1/2in as long as you have a good flow rate

True - from a certain point of view.

Performance is linked to flow rate. The higher the flow rate, the higher the performance. The amount of difference that increased flow rates make gets lesser as flow rates go up.

The issue with 1/4" is that the tubing and fittings offer more resistance to flow. The pump has to work over 4x harder to push water through 1/2" tubing and fittings than it has to work to push the same flow rate through 1/2" tubing and fittings.

So while the flow rates can be equal, the 1/4" solution requires a far stronger pump to achieve the same effect.

Of course, if what you're really saying is that the performance difference between a 1/4" and a 1/2" system when using the same pump is irrelevant to you, then that's a different matter.
 
Cathar said:
Yes - and while we're at it, we can just blithely discount that friction exists and build ourselves perpetual motion machines too I guess?

Well you do need a little torque to get the thing moving and continuing to go. ;) Have you seen how an ion propulsion system works? Amazing how fast that little sucker can go after a few AU's. :D
 
Top Nurse said:
Well you do need a little torque to get the thing moving and continuing to go. ;) Have you seen how an ion propulsion system works? Amazing how fast that little sucker can go after a few AU's. :D

Basic torque/power equation:

Power = torque x rpm.

Whenever a pump is running, it is using all its mechanical power to sustain the flow rate at whatever the flow rate is, which is dictated by the level of back-pressure that the pump has to overcome at that flow-rate.

To say that torque is unimportant to a pump is, well, naive to put it politely. For the torque to be unimportant then the pump must also be drawing zero power.
 
Everytime I get in a conversation with you I feel like I am talking to my father or brothers who all happen to be engineers ;) Are you by chance an engineer?

I bow to your superior knowledge in the mechanical sciences. My forte runs in human engineering so to speak. So I will ask you the same question I always end up asking my family. If all this is true how come these low flow devices work so good? My family tells me it shouldn't and when I press them on it they tell me that something is screwy and suggest I don't use what I have been sucessfully using. :rolleyes:

So perhaps I am not explaining things right as I am a practical kind of gal. I don't want to get involved in too much as to the why's and where's. I just want the thing to work the way I want it to, which they do! :D
 
Am not an engineer. Am actually a computer programmer, but did take advanced physics to 2nd yr university. Not that this helped me that much with water-cooling, other than to facilitate my understanding of it as I learned more about it over the last 4 years.

Top Nurse said:
So I will ask you the same question I always end up asking my family. If all this is true how come these low flow devices work so good?

Sorry to do this to you, but:

1) Define low-flow
2) Define "work so good"

There is no such thing as a device that is optimised to work better at low flow than at higher flow, unless there is some degenerate flow regime happening - but such a circumstance would actually be denying that device the ability to reach its full potential.

When it comes to thermal convection heat transfer, there's no such thing as low flow working better than high flow. This is an utter fallacy, and this is what your family are referring to with their engineering hats on. They are, in fact, very correct.

The real question is this: what is "adequate" for one's needs?
 
Top Nurse said:
If all this is true how come these low flow devices work so good? My family tells me it shouldn't and when I press them on it they tell me that something is screwy and suggest I don't use what I have been sucessfully using. :rolleyes:

So perhaps I am not explaining things right as I am a practical kind of gal. I don't want to get involved in too much as to the why's and where's. I just want the thing to work the way I want it to, which they do! :D


Top Nurse, these "low flow" water cooling devices you refer to may be good at xx flow rate. But if you increase xx flow rate, they will perform better.


Note this graph from Procooling:

Graphy thingy

Every block tested does better with higher flow. But notice with some blocks, and perhaps all at higher and higher flow rates, there is a point of diminishing returns.

It all depends on what you consider acceptable, or as you termed it, "works so good."
 
Back
Top