• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

post your PpD screenies

Tobit said:
Moar D = Another screenie! I just added an 8800GT that has been sitting on the shelf for awhile because it had been EUE'ing constantly in the past. I decided to give it another try so I underclocked it a bit and it completed a WU just fine. I don't know if it's the new core versions that have corrected this problem I was having or my underclocking. I'm going to leave it underclocked for a couple WUs and then put it back to stock speeds and try again.

aexfa0.jpg
Click to expand...

I still say you Bake the sucker! :)
COokie sheet, tinfoil balls holding it up, 375, 10 minutes baby, dont forget the chocolate chips too!
 
I'm still waiting for HFM to update the PPD for my second -bigadv box so that it shows the bonus.

2qxpxte.jpg
 
tjmagneto said:
How did you get so lucky to get stuck with three 1888's?
Click to expand...
He's actually not as lucky as you might think. IME, these 1888's are a lot more chewy than the 353's and even the 787's. I'd rather chew 353's all day than to get an occasional 1888 thrown in the mix. My effective PpD drops a few hundred points when an 1888 is downloaded. Now, this could be because I have only 96 and 112 SP cards, but I'd much rather have only 353's. :D However, it is all for science in the end, right? :cool:
 
Tobit said:
He's actually not as lucky as you might think. IME, these 1888's are a lot more chewy than the 353's and even the 787's. I'd rather chew 353's all day than to get an occasional 1888 thrown in the mix. My effective PpD drops a few hundred points when an 1888 is downloaded. Now, this could be because I have only 96 and 112 SP cards, but I'd much rather have only 353's. :D However, it is all for science in the end, right? :cool:
Click to expand...


the 1888 WU's seem to be on a pattern.. about every 3 days they send out a ton of 1888 pointers.. and then you wont see a single one after that day til the next batch.. or at least thats what it seems like for me..




no problem Tobit.. i just overclocked my card so you should be seeing another 8000-8500 PPD..
 
Ya, I've had 8 at one time once, great way to get nervous when you don't see points fir a few updates
Posted via [H] Mobile Device
 
Hey Zero, how the heck are you getting 5.4K ppd on your Q9550, im only pushing 2.7K with mine.
 
Bumpity

This is after retuning the OC on sig rig and going BIG!!

PpD is down due to the 3 1888's.

PPD-1229-2009.jpg
 
ouch :( look at the failed column, is your overclock stable or its HFM messing up?
Search for UNSTABLE_MACHINE and EARLY_UNIT_END in the log file.
 
404 - File not found said:
ouch :( look at the failed column, is your overclock stable or its HFM messing up?
Search for UNSTABLE_MACHINE and EARLY_UNIT_END in the log file.
Click to expand...

It is heat. There isn't much I can do about it. They always fail within seconds, so no real loss of PpD.
 
Heres my image from FahSpy.

FahSpy.jpg


Add around another 6x12k PpD for the bigadv bonuses.

Luck ............ :D
 
Zero82z said:
It's overclocked to 3.8GHz and I'm running a VM across four cores.
Click to expand...

Im pushing a single VM across 4 cores as well, just not clocked that high, at 3.2ghz right now.
 
FrEaKy said:
Im pushing a single VM across 4 cores as well, just not clocked that high, at 3.2ghz right now.
Click to expand...
You should still be doing more than 2.7k easily. I'm doing over 4k PPD on a Q6600 I have clocked at 3GHz in another box.
 
Zero82z said:
You should still be doing more than 2.7k easily. I'm doing over 4k PPD on a Q6600 I have clocked at 3GHz in another box.
Click to expand...

My Q6600's where doing ~4.5-4.8k PpD @3.1Ghz running a VM across all 4 cores before I shut them down.

Luck ......... :D

 
Cpu only client. Wife was thinking that the F@H was slowing the computer down, so I put it to 7/8. :D

 
Last edited:
Several farm upgrades call for a new screenie:

2itoenc.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top