Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.
Actually, it's a very good question, and there is no simple yet complete answer for desktop users. HDTach and Atto are good tools for making sure that the drive performs "as expected" and comparably to similar drives, but they are synthetic tests that do a poor job of reflecting desktop access patterns and the overriding phenomenon of locality in seeks. Sandra, owing to its insistence on using unrealistic queue depths, is an unusally poor test (although it does somewhat accurately measure Windows XP bootup performance). IOMeter gives good information on highly random server/multitasking performance, but once again does not account for locality.
Unless you want to go to the trouble of creating I/O traces of programs, running RankDisk and IPEAK, the only way to measure desktop hard drive performance on the desktop is with the general responsiveness of the computer, and that's what important anyway.