Norton 2003 or AVG?

[cuemasterfl]

I had always used Norton 2003 up until about 6 weeks ago. I then formatted, and tried AVG. My computer was noticeably faster. However, I formatted again last night due to a family member downloading something they shouldn't which started to cause several problems. I put Norton 2003 back on again, and it just feels sluggish compared to when I was using AVG.

I'm thinking of putting AVG back on again. Should I?

 

[odoe]

deja vu

 

[cuemasterfl]

Originally posted by odoe
deja vu

Well, based on that, I'll keep Norton 2003 Thanks.

 

[Aquarianwolf]

or how about pc cillin...works great for me...better then avg and mcafee....those are the only ones ive tried

 

[tdg]

I'd use AVG over Norton anyday. Nortons a major resource hog.

 

[Sean]

Even if norton is a resource hog, my system can handle it. Its not a hog if you have the power. On older slower system, it does suck the life out of the system. I really found that for Norton to work well, you need a good system hard drive, and good ram.

Cheers,