I have been working on a new Raid 5 server for a while and today i got a fair transfer rate for the first time(i can write to the server at 70-80mbps)
I have created 1 array with 7x750GB's and 1 750Gb hot spare.
then i created 2X 2TB logical disks and in Win xp i have created 2 "simple" volumes F: and G: based on the logical disks this works, but my initial plan was to have 1 large volume but I'm not sure if using the spanned or stripe option in winxp disk management will destroy the raid5 volume and the parity "security" in raid 5?
another thing: It was in the Intel web console that I used these settings to get fast write:
Read---> No Read Ahead
Write---> (changed it from 'Thru' to 'Back' and then the speed improved)
I/O---> Direct
when i changed the Write setting i got an alert:
"Battery Absent. Improper shutdown or powerfail will result in loss of data with Write Back mode."
So i guess my setup will be bad no matter what i do
I have bought an UPS so isn't that helping or am i taking a big risk by changing 'Thru' to 'Back' with no battery?
I have created 1 array with 7x750GB's and 1 750Gb hot spare.
then i created 2X 2TB logical disks and in Win xp i have created 2 "simple" volumes F: and G: based on the logical disks this works, but my initial plan was to have 1 large volume but I'm not sure if using the spanned or stripe option in winxp disk management will destroy the raid5 volume and the parity "security" in raid 5?
another thing: It was in the Intel web console that I used these settings to get fast write:
Read---> No Read Ahead
Write---> (changed it from 'Thru' to 'Back' and then the speed improved)
I/O---> Direct
when i changed the Write setting i got an alert:
"Battery Absent. Improper shutdown or powerfail will result in loss of data with Write Back mode."
So i guess my setup will be bad no matter what i do
I have bought an UPS so isn't that helping or am i taking a big risk by changing 'Thru' to 'Back' with no battery?