Put the computer together last May. Been running well until Friday night. Haven't changed any hardware in 2 months. Never even overclocked. I know, I know, just never needed to. Maybe for HL2 or Doom3. Anyway, starting Friday night, all my downloads from Usenet were corrupted. Using Agent 2.0. Started a couple of other applications, then started Agent, and voila, the downloads were fine.
Thinking memory, I ran Memtest86. The test hung at 8 minutes on test 7. Pulled out one of the memory sticks and tested again. Test hung at 5 minutes. Swapped the memory sticks. Test hung again. Proceeded to try every configuration of memory and slots (2 sticks * 4 slots = 8 configurations) and sometimes I would get error reports, usually just a hung test. No combination was solid.
After all that, I am thinking it is the MB. I am skeptical that BOTH sticks of memory would just happen to fail. If I had an extra stick of DDR around, I would give it a go, but is that really necessary? With all that testing and the results, doesn't it have to be the MB?
So, have I missed something (usually obvious
), or is the MB the likely culprit?
Thinking memory, I ran Memtest86. The test hung at 8 minutes on test 7. Pulled out one of the memory sticks and tested again. Test hung at 5 minutes. Swapped the memory sticks. Test hung again. Proceeded to try every configuration of memory and slots (2 sticks * 4 slots = 8 configurations) and sometimes I would get error reports, usually just a hung test. No combination was solid.
After all that, I am thinking it is the MB. I am skeptical that BOTH sticks of memory would just happen to fail. If I had an extra stick of DDR around, I would give it a go, but is that really necessary? With all that testing and the results, doesn't it have to be the MB?
So, have I missed something (usually obvious