• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

IDE Cable Length & Data Integrity

HitMan-sC

Gawd
Joined
Feb 19, 2003
Messages
987
Do longer IDE cables have less data integrity than shorter cables? As in, would a 36" cable be more prone to data corruption or just less reliable than say, an 18" cable? I was just wondering, since longer cables would make wiring any case a bit easier.
 
HitMan-sC said:
Do longer IDE cables have less data integrity than shorter cables? As in, would a 36" cable be more prone to data corruption or just less reliable than say, an 18" cable? I was just wondering, since longer cables would make wiring any case a bit easier.

I know it was a factor back in the IDE 33 days. I believe it’s less of a factor now but the longest I’ve seen is 36”. I believe anything longer would be a possible bad thing.

Luck
 
Buckus said:
I believe 36" is the max length under the IDE specification.
24 is the max suggested, but 36 usually works. The problem is usually that there are corruptions which get caught by error checking and the "packet" must be resent, causing a slowdown. Longer cables can make for slower transmissions, but not usually for more error-prone data files on disk.
 
no the max length is 18 by spec. this has never changed, but others think it has since non-compliant cables are common. one more reason for sata.
 
Back
Top