I need a different take on Intel-AMD

[scorpy]

I am going to get a new system at the end of August during pricecuts. I had a 667Mhz P3 in the past, and have my current AthlonXP2400. The Intel always seemed much more zippy in Windows tasks, where Athlon dragged. Gaming clearly was better with the new processor, but thats mostly due to the speed boost. I would like a good game machine because I do love playing the newest FPS, but I would like Windows to be responsive. I'm not going to overclock, and framerate isn't everything. BUT I need a honest Intel or AMD answer. The benchmarks show Intel leads in Windows type tasks IMHO, but AMD seems to lead for games. Is this true for real life applications? I just am kind of disappointed with the Windows performance on my current setup.

Currently looking at buying a prebuilt (don't massacre me) Dell or HP machine. It will be equipped with -
P4 3.4E Ghz or a AMD 3400+
512 PC3200 RAM
120 GB ATA drive
Audigy 2 ZS sound
17" CRT
9800 Pro (already have)

I do have to buy everything for it, since the rest of my system will be donated to siblings. Not crazy on getting a Prescott, but cannot find vendors offering the Northwood in package deals. I can go either way processor wise, but I kinda lean towards Intel for its response time in Windows. My biggest issue is cooling in their stock boxes. I am looking to spend around $1200 for the machine, so I have some flexibility.

Lastly, at Toms Hardware, he reviewed the 3.4E and stated this,

"In the meantime, if you plan to upgrade to a Prescott processor now, make sure that you get a D0 stepping chip."

What do they mean by that?

Thank you to all who made it this far, I do ramble on. Pat yourself on the back, and post some good feedback. I have been debating over this for quite some time now, I need more opinions. Thanks!!!

 

[Spec3]

I know what you mean about Intel feeling more zippy for sure. After 6 AMD systems I went intel and havne't looked back since. But a few weeks ago I ordered an A64 system. Basically they blow intel out of the water for gaming results and that's why I got it. I don't think a 2.2Ghz 64bit processor is going to be slow in windows no matter how you look at it so I would go that way. I'm sure someone who already has both systems can come and tell us both if the A64 is as zippy as the P4...because I would like to know as well

Steve

 

[AMD T-type]

really it comes down to (like always) how much you are willing to spend.
Right now, if you want the best chip you want to get an Athlon64

My roomate had a 2.4 Pentium 4 running at 3.6GHz
He sold it to get an Athlon XP running at 2.5GHz
He said he did notice multi-tasking in windows was a little slower but his games were better
Recently he purchased an Athlon64 and it blew both his previous chips out of the water

 

[scorpy]

Well, that sort of helps....

Am I the only one who likes zippy windows and moderate/heavy gaming? My mind says go for the A64 for the killer game speed, but my current Athlon makes me reconsider. Plus, I kind of like the idea of running in the 3 Ghz range

I just hate having to wait for my processor to catch up with me in programs. Maybe it is just me, but it seems to take a while for some things to load. I did not notice that as much on my trusty 667Mhz Intel. Again, that was running Win98 and ME, so that can be deceiving. I need someone who has owned both to verify. Please, anyone?? This is killin me!