I just implemented Google Apps for my company as a backup e-mail solution. I have 15 users on the Google Apps e-mail backup, concurrent with the users that are on my main e-mail server. It works perfectly fine, or at least I think it does. My e-mail server has never went down, so I haven't really tested it. However, I can be sure it works, because, unfortunately, a little issue has arisen.
Currently, I have 6 MX records for my domain, in the following order:
"mydomainserver"(10)
aspmx.l.google.com.(20)
alt1.aspmx.l.google.com.(30)
alt2.aspmx.l.google.com.(40)
aspmx2.googlemail.com.(50)
aspmx3.googlemail.com.(60)
On my main server, "mydomainserver", I've implemented all types of SPAM filtering techniques that are very effective, sometimes too effective. But this is besides the point. the problem here is this:
I've read that a favorite technique of spammers is to use the lowest priority MX records in order to send their junk. And they surely do. I've also read that it's not recommended to have more than 1 MX record as a backup. What I've been finding out is that in all of my users' respective Gmail mailboxes, the SPAM is being delivered there!!!
How can I alleviate this problem? And also, what numbering scheme should I use for the MX record priorities?
Thanks for everything!!!
Currently, I have 6 MX records for my domain, in the following order:
"mydomainserver"(10)
aspmx.l.google.com.(20)
alt1.aspmx.l.google.com.(30)
alt2.aspmx.l.google.com.(40)
aspmx2.googlemail.com.(50)
aspmx3.googlemail.com.(60)
On my main server, "mydomainserver", I've implemented all types of SPAM filtering techniques that are very effective, sometimes too effective. But this is besides the point. the problem here is this:
I've read that a favorite technique of spammers is to use the lowest priority MX records in order to send their junk. And they surely do. I've also read that it's not recommended to have more than 1 MX record as a backup. What I've been finding out is that in all of my users' respective Gmail mailboxes, the SPAM is being delivered there!!!
How can I alleviate this problem? And also, what numbering scheme should I use for the MX record priorities?
Thanks for everything!!!