• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

GPU Folding Clarification

Whaler_99

Weaksauce
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
74
Hey guys,
As some of you might know/remember, I am very active with Folding over with the LinusTechTips team. One of the things that comes up on the forum frequently, and there seem to be no definitive answers on, is around GPU Folding. I am hoping some of the seasoned vets here can add their two cents to the following questions:

1 - What impact does GPU Folding have on the CPUs?

I know, when installing the FAH client, it leaves one core free "for the GPU" when the conditions are correct. But how much of an impact will this make, not having any cores free? As far I know and have been able to determine, have a core free per GPU does make a slight performance increase on the GPU side, but not that much to definitively say "You must have one core free per GPU..."

2 - The more modern GPU Cores (17 and 18) are very CPU intensive as well?

3 - The more modern GPU Cores (17 and 18) need more bandwidth, in regards to the slots?

Previously I had built GPU folding rigs where I used x1 to x16 expanders to get GPU's folding in the x1 slots in my board along with the x16. There are some saying that now, with these new cores, you need the bandwidth of at least a 8x if not a 16x to get the full performance. Thoughts?

4 - Overall how much of an impact does GPU Folding have on the CPU?

It was always my understanding that 99% of the work on a WU for GPU folding was done, on the GPU. Period. Yes, having a core free could give a bit of performance boost, but not much. Slot bandwidth wasn't an issue as the WU's were actually pretty small in size. Basically a GPU WU was for the GPU. Rest didn't matter, a whole lot.

There seem to be some that believe the newer GPU cores need a lot of CPU power, bandwidth, etc. and I am just trying to clarify what people are seeing out there, as there doesn't seem to be a lot of official stuff on this. If there is some floating around there, links would also be greatly appreciated!

Thanks!
 
can't answer all of them but I do remember reading somewhere over on Folding Forum that the cpu usage is nothing to do with the actual WU, its the driver constantly polling the cpu and it only really affects NVidia based cards. If you don't have a free core, WU processing time goes through the roof and on the new QRB WU every second does count

I've seen posts on FF saying that the performance degradation from x16 to x4 is 20% less ppd on the slower slots

Try this thread for some more info:- https://foldingforum.org/viewtopic.php?f=80&t=27450
 
Last edited:
Back
Top