• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

Good mem for OCing

Elios

Supreme [H]ardness
Joined
Aug 12, 2004
Messages
7,319
im looking for some good memory to OC with
i would like some that can reach 250Mhz stock or will OC the that
but not sure whats good i was looking at the XMS Pro line of PC3200
can that be OCed that high with lax timeings or is there better memory to get that high?
 
I would reccomend OCZ 3700 EB, which has superb timings at 250.

Quote from Anandtech
"End users are reporting very consistent results with overclocking OCZ 3700EB. For that reason, we consider the choice between Crucial Ballistix and OCZ EB a toss-up. Ballistix is better at DDR400, but EB is reliable in consistently reaching high overclocks on the MSI K8N Neo2."

-This is from the High End buyers guide, these are the top two for DDR

Also, thats what I'm gonna get when i build my 3000+ system!
 
I'm running 2 X 256 MB sticks of OCZ PC4400 EL Gold in my IC7-G board at 275 fsb 1:1 and no problems at 2.5-4-4-8 timings. They also make 512 MB sticks of the same stuff too, but it's pricey. This is the first OCZ ram I've ever used, due to their shady past, but I'm impressed with this ram. I found it in the refurb dept at Newegg. :D
 
I went with PC4000 Crucial Ballistix since all the benchies I could find show the $10 more over Ballistix PC3200 is worth it.

I chose a K8N Neo Platinum
2 x 512MB Crucial Ballistix PC4000
still deciding between Athlon64 3000+, 3200+ and 3400+ (Newcastle 512k L2 cache). I'm leaning towards the 3200+ because the 3400+ is $100 CDN more, but doesn't give any better overclock on average. If I could find a CG stepped Clawhammer, I'd snap it up right away but all I can find are C0 Cludhoppers.

According to: http://www.extremeoverclocking.com/reviews/memory/Crucial-Ballistix-PC4000_3.html
I can expect 2-2-2-5 timings at 200Mhz, (5104 PCMark04 score)
or 2.5-4-4-8 timings at 255Mhz. (5450 PCMark04 score)
I realize these tests were done on an Intel platform, but Anandtech has reported that these Ballistix memory modules perform just as well on AMD platforms (which is unusual).

From http://www.anandtech.com/memory/showdoc.aspx?i=2145&p=19 "The only memory that duplicated the Intel results on Athlon 64 was the Crucial Ballistics PC3200, based on Micron chips. Across the entire range from DDR400 to DDR514, the Ballistix performed at the same voltages and timings that it displayed on the Intel test bed. This performance reminds us that Micron memory chips are also used in OCZ 3500EB and 3700EB, which also perform as well on Athlon 64 as they do on an Intel board."

Anybody else using Ballistix memory?
 
Back
Top