• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

Foobar = Wow!

pinktank said:
foobar has better reproduction than winamp, winamp has good sound prod if u use output plugins which will give you floating 64 bit reprod .
Click to expand...
Tell me why you think that. Oh, and consider that the developers disagree with you,

http://www.foobar2000.org/FAQ.html#FAQ_o7
Does foobar2000 sound better than other players?
No. Most of "sound quality differences" people "hear" are placebo effect (at least with real music), as actual differences in produced sound data are below their noise floor (1 or 2 last bits in 16bit samples). Foobar2000 has sound processing features such as software resampling or 24bit output on new high-end soundcards, but most of other mainstream players are capable of doing the same by now.
Click to expand...
 
xonik said:
LCD/VFD support is important to me, and comparing with Foobar, the sound quality differences are nil.
Click to expand...

Understandable. I know there is plugins that write text out and that could be used for some sort of LCD/VFD program, along with HTTP writers, etc. I guess it depends on what your software supports [I know many have native support for winamp]

As for sound quality.. does it count that foobar comes with KS and ASIO plugins? :D
 
does it count that foobar comes with KS and ASIO plugins?
Click to expand...

No, it just saves you from having to download the Winamp plugins that offer the same features
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top