• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

Decisions, Decisions...

CptFalcon

[H]ard|Gawd
Joined
Dec 13, 2006
Messages
2,012
Which is a better buy for me a QX6700 or a X6800 for a real 1337 gaming PC that I will also use for CAD? Need answers, FAST! (please! :p )
 
if you are doing CAD the QX6700 will outperform the x6800. at stock, the x6800 (since it has a higher clock and most games are not multi-threaded) outperforms the qx6700 in games.

however you can overclock.. :)
 
VR-Zone Cadalyst 2006

Maybe this will help.

He was willing to test it, and it seems very quick.

I can't afford it, but I did get an E6400 and overclocked it to 3GHz, I will run the test tonight and post a screen shot for a reference.

Keep in mind a good graphics card goes along way in CAD as well.

I do Autocad as well, as well as beta test, the future version of Autocad should get a nice boost from multiple cores and Vista.
 
keldegar said:
if you are doing CAD the QX6700 will outperform the x6800. at stock, the x6800 (since it has a higher clock and most games are not multi-threaded) outperforms the qx6700 in games.

however you can overclock.. :)

Well I could just build 2 identical PC's and have the QX6700 in one and the X6800 in another... :confused:
 
CptFalcon said:
Well I could just build 2 identical PC's and have the QX6700 in one and the X6800 in another... :confused:
well future games like alan wake ARE multithreaded and will be faster on the qx6700.
software has to catch up to hardware..
 
sshot20061221autocad200uo0.png


It seems the test was faster, but not the score.

For comparison...

Dual Opteron MB PCI-E, with AMD Dual Core
Opteron 280 (2.4GHz) CPUs, 2GB PC3200 Memory, nVIDIA Quadro
FX4500 graphics card, and 2xWD SATA 74G 10K RPM Hard Disk
(8M Cache) configured for RAID-0 (striping).

This sytem scored a 145, also look at the graphics card

My system has an X1900XT.

Hope it helps.
 
Back
Top