• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

Beyond3D article- NV50

Andromeda

n00b
Joined
Aug 23, 2004
Messages
27
NV50 in late 2005?
25-Aug-2004, 09:07.21 Reporter : DaveBaumann
Following the Games Convention in Leipzig golem.de is reporting that following the launch of GeForce 6600 NVIDIA will move the NV4x range into the low end segment, replacing the 5200 series with an NV4x based version, and an notebook NV4x part will soon to be introduced on the NVIDIA MXM notebook video board format - a look at the PCI Express Integrators List shows NV43M, indicating that the mobile part coming first is a version of the 6600. However, evidently NVIDIA have signalled the end to the 12 month architectural cycle.

In statement that echoed ATI's previous sentiments, NVIDIA are suggesting that due to chip complexities and lithography cycle times architectural innovation times will be pushed out to about 18 months. Although NVIDIA are suggesting similar things to ATI now, if we look at NVIDIA's NV2x and NV3x generations, they have been on greater than 12 month cycles for the past two generations anyway (taking into account that NV30 was launched in November 2002, which was probably close to its intended introduction). This being the case, given NV40's announcement and wide scale availability, it would suggest that the NV50 series will not be announced until late 2005 with possible wide scale availability in 2006. NVIDIA have already stated to their investors that the low end NV4x parts will last for up to 3 years, indicating that the NV5x range will remain the domain of the high end segments and that NV4x will stay around until "Windows Graphics Foundation" in Micorsofts next geneteration OS, Longhorn.

The release of Longhorn will also be critical to both NVIDIA and ATI's plans - given the timing and the fact that there are not to be any low end NV5x, this may suggest that NV5x is set to be an extended Shader 3.0 architecture, which would indicate that the further Longhorn moves into 2007 the better it would suit NVIDIA's architectural innovation cycle. Presently the expectation is that ATI will introduce their Shader 3.0 part, suggested to be primarily developed by the R300 architectural team, in mid 2005 - ATI may be a little off their 18 month cycle as they chose not to innovate as much this cycle in order to hit the PCI Express transition - and that would also suggest that "R600" based parts would come in the late 2006 / early 2007 period. Regardless of longterm exrapolated timescales, though, its likely that both vendors will attempt to hit as close to the introduction of Longhorn as possible.


To me that looks like pretty good news. Seems like my new 6800GT will be lasting as long as my Ti4200 did :)
 
Andromeda said:
To me that looks like pretty good news. Seems like my new 6800GT will be lasting as long as my Ti4200 did :)

amen to that. I love my GT.
 
It'll last for ages so long as you don't intend to upgrade your CPU, as I doubt you'll be able to find any high end mobos with AGP in to 2005 -2006 and beyond.
 
Maybe we'll get better products (and software to support them) if product life cycles are extended. In the long run, it may make them more moolah - if people know that product cycles are every 1.5 years (instead of ~12 mos.), they'd be less inclined to skip a generation before upgrading. I know I would be.

Even if they don't put out a refresh of the current crop of cards for awhile, we'll be fine for any game on the horizon.
 
MetalStorm said:
It'll last for ages so long as you don't intend to upgrade your CPU, as I doubt you'll be able to find any high end mobos with AGP in to 2005 -2006 and beyond.

Interesting comment knowing that they still make PCIx33 graphics cards. How many years has AGP been around again?
As I've stated b4, if Intel stops making "high end" chipsets that support AGP, I'll happily jump ship to AMD on my next upgrade cycle. AGP has been around waaaay too long to dump in that short a time frame. In conclusion, I'll be moving my GT to my next rig in 4Q 2005. Only question is whether it'll be an AMD or Intel board.
 
yevaud said:
Interesting comment knowing that they still make PCIx33 graphics cards. How many years has AGP been around again?
As I've stated b4, if Intel stops making "high end" chipsets that support AGP, I'll happily jump ship to AMD on my next upgrade cycle. AGP has been around waaaay too long to dump in that short a time frame. In conclusion, I'll be moving my GT to my next rig in 4Q 2005. Only question is whether it'll be an AMD or Intel board.

i really hope you are right, im hoping i can keep my GT when i move to 939 in Q2 next year. i dont want to have to spend another 400 bucks on a video card because the interface changed, and i wanted to have good performance for the next year as well.
 
This is news?

ATI and NV announced that they had changed architecture cycles from 12-18 to 18-24 months a long time ago. That said, ATIs new architecture isn't out until the first half of 2005 with the R500. They're lagging behind due to this generations wave. Can't wait for the R500 :)
 
Well the rumors I have heard seem to suggest that the R500 will not be a SM3.0 part. They are going to skip that and go right to the DX Next shader model. Don't know how true this is though.
 
peltman78 said:
Well the rumors I have heard seem to suggest that the R500 will not be a SM3.0 part. They are going to skip that and go right to the DX Next shader model. Don't know how true this is though.

even if they did and went right to SM 4.0 since DX is backwards compatible it would also support SM 3.0

but there is no point to move to SM 4.0 until DX Next (DX10) is out in Longhorn though, it would be features that would never be used for a year or two, not to even mention game support of the features

with longhorn not being out till 2006 or more likely 2007 i see no reason to have a SM 4.0 part introduced in 2005, 2005-2006 should be the years of SM 3.0, at least thats the way i see it

it all hinges on Longhorns release
 
Brent_Justice said:
even if they did and went right to SM 4.0 since DX is backwards compatible it would also support SM 3.0

but there is no point to move to SM 4.0 until DX Next (DX10) is out in Longhorn though, it would be features that would never be used for a year or two, not to even mention game support of the features

with longhorn not being out till 2006 or more likely 2007 i see no reason to have a SM 4.0 part introduced in 2005, 2005-2006 should be the years of SM 3.0, at least thats the way i see it

it all hinges on Longhorns release


Very True. Longhorn should be revolutionary but as you are saying programs to actually use its functions will take time to develop
 
This is a very interesting read
glad i did upgrade my FX5900XT to a 6800GT
also i been with AMD for along time now along with nVidia
they just seem to work the best with each other.
for me i will be upgrading this october and november when the NF4 boards come out
i will be also dumping 800+ dollars into 2 BFG6800GTOC PCI-E for SLI
w00t w00t
yes i have a good job and my wife says i can do it...i am a lucky man :D
 
so it would be worth it to get a 6800GT right now? hmm..any idea when its price would probably drop? or is it gonna stay at its $400 mark for awhile.
 
Don't even think about a price drop until well after christmas. I'll be sticking with my eVGA 6800GT well into 2005 before I move into the PCI express world of things.
 
yep 6800gt looks like it will last a lonnnnnng time especially with its sm3.0 support and openexr hdr.
 
Brent_Justice said:
even if they did and went right to SM 4.0 since DX is backwards compatible it would also support SM 3.0

but there is no point to move to SM 4.0 until DX Next (DX10) is out in Longhorn though, it would be features that would never be used for a year or two, not to even mention game support of the features

with longhorn not being out till 2006 or more likely 2007 i see no reason to have a SM 4.0 part introduced in 2005, 2005-2006 should be the years of SM 3.0, at least thats the way i see it

it all hinges on Longhorns release

Though I doubt they'd go that route, I hardly think that having a more futureproof featureset (via SM4 / DX10) would be a waste as you seem to imply. I mean, It's not like those features will never get used right?

Athlon64 anyone? :)
 
I think that there will be increasing number of refreshes(see 9700 pro, 9800 pro, 9800 xt) where the core technology is the same, while the only boost is incremental speed. There's just no reason to design totally new architectures until dx next comes out. The way I see it now, our games don't even begin to push the shader limit's of today's cards.
 
archevilangel said:
There's just no reason to design totally new architectures until dx next comes out. The way I see it now, our games don't even begin to push the shader limit's of today's cards.

bingo
 
Yep! Also agree with the guy who likens the GT to his Ti4200., it will hold down the fort for quite some time. Dont think I will make another hardware upgrade other than a Blueray drive until atleast Longhorn comes. ;)
 
Interesting comment knowing that they still make PCIx33 graphics cards. How many years has AGP been around again?
As I've stated b4, if Intel stops making "high end" chipsets that support AGP, I'll happily jump ship to AMD on my next upgrade cycle. AGP has been around waaaay too long to dump in that short a time frame. In conclusion, I'll be moving my GT to my next rig in 4Q 2005. Only question is whether it'll be an AMD or Intel board.

That's because there can only be one AGP slot thus the reason for PCI. PCI is still around because AGP can't 'take over' like PCI Express can, and will.
 
EQTakeOffense said:
That's because there can only be one AGP slot thus the reason for PCI. PCI is still around because AGP can't 'take over' like PCI Express can, and will.

But ISA was around for quite some time, wasn't it?

I was forced to buy a new video card because my other one broke, and I don't have PCI-express... So I would hope that newer boards will support AGP for a while. I guess if not, it always gives me an excuse to upgrade again. :p
 
GeniusInABottle said:
Though I doubt they'd go that route, I hardly think that having a more futureproof featureset (via SM4 / DX10) would be a waste as you seem to imply. I mean, It's not like those features will never get used right?

Athlon64 anyone? :)

It just might, actually.

ATI has already been 'burned' on this.

You all know the original Radeon supported programmable shaders, right? Yup, if DX8 had been released at the years-earlier spec had indicated, the original Radeon would have been the first 'DX8 part'. Only, the spec changed after ATI had finalized their hardware (since it hadn't been released yet, and was in flux), and suddenly all the shader support on the original Radeon was completely useless.

The danger of 'jumping the gun' on MS by TOO many years. It's safer to wait!
 
dderidex said:
It just might, actually.

ATI has already been 'burned' on this.

You all know the original Radeon supported programmable shaders, right? Yup, if DX8 had been released at the years-earlier spec had indicated, the original Radeon would have been the first 'DX8 part'. Only, the spec changed after ATI had finalized their hardware (since it hadn't been released yet, and was in flux), and suddenly all the shader support on the original Radeon was completely useless.

The danger of 'jumping the gun' on MS by TOO many years. It's safer to wait!
Good point, it's hard to do the one with a solution "at the right time." The 9700 Pro did come out before DX9 was finalized but the whole FX series was an embarrassment.
 
Does anybody know if there is or ever will be some form of adapter for PCI-E so that you could install an AGP card in a PCI-E graphics slot?

I'm wanting to maybe upgrade to an nForce 4 mobo with PCI-E and an s939 A64 next spring/summer but i dont want to have to buy another new $400 video card when my 6800 GT will still be damn fast next year.
 
Wouldn't that be like having an AGP adapter for non AGP MBs? I don't think it's possible to have an AGP to PCIe adapter.
 
CrimandEvil said:
Wouldn't that be like having an AGP adapter for non AGP MBs? I don't think it's possible to have an AGP to PCIe adapter.

No it wouldn't be like lol.

PCI-E is much faster then AGP so i dont see how it couldn't be backwards compatible with some sort of bridge adapter. The nVidia PCI-E cards are essentially AGP cards with a bridge anyways. They aren't native PCI-E.
 
I took you to mean something sort of like this which wouldn't make much sense, lol.
I guess I'm still not totally understand since an adapter (physical and not intergrated like NV's PCIe cards) will add extra height.
 
Back
Top