The point is AMD is gaining market share -- that is real, meaning Nvidia is losing market share
. This is with no major big changes in the last two quarters too
. Why? - AMD has better performing cards $400 and down. AMD is making some money from consoles but also achieving a lot of mindshare as well, DX12 will be way more friendlier with AMD GCN arch then Nvidia's Fermi, Kepler and yet another Maxwell. Pascal is to be seen. Vulkan should as well. As developers develope more and more on AMD driven GPU's the better for AMD hardware. Pascal is being deployed as a new high end chip while AMD Polaris will be called a Mainstream chip that may indeed beat the 1070 in performance at a cheaper cost. If AMD can get a better performing card then the 1070 and everything down - Then later with a real Enthusiast chip, Vega - market share may explode for AMD. Nvidia recourse is to bargain bin their inventory at very low prices to stall the take over while they catch up on the Mainstream line. For example 970's for $200.
gaining marketshare is good, but when you don't have products for 9 months that really don't compete, then you do, you better gain marketshare.
Noko, did you see the comments about AOTS and async/ DX12 and the in game benchmarks yet? Something really weird is going on with them with nV hardware, when doing in game testing with presentmon the results are totally different..... There doesn't seem to be any advantage nothing substantial at least for AMD hardware, and Pascal definitely shows that where it has DX12 advantages over FuryX in Hitman, where its 30+% faster.
The rest, I just don't know how you are even coming up with all that.....
Last edited: