I simply don't get how you people post your 3dmark05 scores and have them be accurate based on your computers capabilities. For instance, look at my signature. I normally run my games at absolute highest possible settings for my computer. 1280x1024 at 6AA, and Anisotropic 16x, etc.
I ran 3dmark05 at 1024x768, no AA, no Anisotropic, and ALL tests and scored a 5947.
I then ran it again at highest settings which I normally run regular games such as DOOM3, HL2, and BF2 at 1280x1024, 6AA, Anisotropic 16x, and I scored a 3504.
Now to make it look better I could put the 5947 in my sig, but that's stupid since that's the easier settings, hell I could drop to 800x600 and probably do a craploda better. This is confusing because it would seem smart that you are given bonus points for using the AA, anisotropic, and Higher res settings, but I guess all it does is PENALIZE your 3dmark05 score..
Show me the light someone, 3dmark doesn't make sense.
I ran 3dmark05 at 1024x768, no AA, no Anisotropic, and ALL tests and scored a 5947.
I then ran it again at highest settings which I normally run regular games such as DOOM3, HL2, and BF2 at 1280x1024, 6AA, Anisotropic 16x, and I scored a 3504.
Now to make it look better I could put the 5947 in my sig, but that's stupid since that's the easier settings, hell I could drop to 800x600 and probably do a craploda better. This is confusing because it would seem smart that you are given bonus points for using the AA, anisotropic, and Higher res settings, but I guess all it does is PENALIZE your 3dmark05 score..
Show me the light someone, 3dmark doesn't make sense.