• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

3.73EE Vs 660

Status
Not open for further replies.
This is my pure speculation...


Maybe the EE has better cache that is alot lower in latency, such as what is featured on the Pentium M. This could be a difference that would seperate it from the general 600 series
 
but then the cache would be holding back the clock speeds of the chip severely. think of it like regular memory. tigher the timings, the less likely you're gonna hit high speeds.
unless you have bh-5/utt, but that's a different story ;)
 
I just come at it from a different angle I think of thinking about it. I always want the lowest latency, even in sacrifice of some speed.

I am that way with my ram too. I will set my ram at 2-2-2 and whever speed in MHz i get, i Get.. and thats where it stays. I seem to feel that over my time in computer history, lower timings and stuff came out to a smoother expirance...

To me I will notice extremly tight timings in "smoothness" over loose timings and a few more MHz

But i may just be full of shit :) we all do it a different way
 
Redefined said:
ROFL, you never showed me a 3.73EE on ebay. lol if you did, i would of bid on it ASAP.

Post # 94 in the thread you started where you asking where to buy one: at the time I posted the link... it was only at $610!! It ended up selling for $1006.

P.S. The P4 3.73EE does not have a different cache. (nothing like the Pentium M) If anything it might have some little PAT mode enabled on it. (probably in the chipset, not the the chip even)
But it hasn't even been conclusively tested (proved). B/c Intel mentions nothing about lower latencies for the EE in any of the specs, literature, etc..
 
chrisf6969 said:
Intel mentions nothing about lower latencies for the EE in any of the specs, literature, etc..

which is odd. you'd think that if there was a good reason for us enthusiasts to buy intel's most expensive chip, they'd want to tell us. for an educated enthusiast the EE doesn't look so good because the only "benefit" over the standard p4 is the 1066mhz bus, which has proven to be basically worthless.
 
Redefined said:
lol, everyone wants me to buy the 3.73EE. well im trying people! im poor! im selling my other pc parts on ebay to get one! or if not the 3.73EE, it will be a P4 660.

buy the EE. Its the best way to invest your money in this economy and we want to see 13 more "OMG! the EE pwns all cpus" threads from you
 
chrisf6969 said:
Report me to the cry baby police too while you're at it...

warning noob & loser posts ahead!!

http://www.hardforum.com/showpost.php?p=1027280777&postcount=22
cool.gif


i got a warning for that, but it was so worth it...lol

:p
 
chrisf6969 said:

wow your so pathetic, i mean come on grow up. you go and search all my previous threads. are you like 14 or something? oh and plus that thread you showed me. thats just about 3 months old :rolleyes: , and the price is not 600...its 1,000. so ill rather just buy one new. :rolleyes:
 
You all would do well to read and believe my post stickied at the top of this forum.

Remember the rules you guys agreed to when you joined? Take this one, number one on the list, for example:
(1) Absolutely NO FLAMING OR NAME CALLING. Mutual respect and civilized conversation is the required norm.
Additional attention will be paid to this forum, count on it. The trolling, flaming, and personal attacks will stop. If administrative action is required to make the point, it can and will be arranged.

Enough is enough, gentlemen - B.B.S.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top