• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

2900gt

tronics

Weaksauce
Joined
Aug 30, 2004
Messages
87
I know someone that is selling a 2900gt for $95, they only used on with linux so they were not able to tell me how well it performs with games. I was wondering if anyone could tell if its worth the 95 over my current 7900gs card? Specificly crysis and such newer games?
 
i wasn't able to find any benchmarks for it, but how well do you think it will run ut3 and crysis?
 
Similar to the 2900XT or 3850 scores but a little slower. It has 256megabit memory bus like the 3850 but with slower ram and core. It's only got 240 instead of 320 stream processors.
Nice card for $95 though. :eek:

fake edit: It's a lot faster than an X1950pro.
 
Similar to the 2900XT or 3850 scores but a little slower. It has 256megabit memory bus like the 3850 but with slower ram and core. It's only got 240 instead of 320 stream processors.
Nice card for $95 though. :eek:

fake edit: It's a lot faster than an X1950pro.

Actually, it's not. It's about even with the X1950 Pro and trades blows with the 8600 GTS most of the time. But for $95, it's a good buy.
 
i wasn't able to find any benchmarks for it, but how well do you think it will run ut3 and crysis?

In UT3 it does quite well, but forget about Crysis. You should be able to play it, with all settings set to medium, but at a low resolution, such as 1024x768. Performance would still be very bad.
 
In UT3 it does quite well, but forget about Crysis. You should be able to play it, with all settings set to medium, but at a low resolution, such as 1024x768. Performance would still be very bad.

I beg to differ-I play crysis on my much slower 7800gt with everything set to high except for shaders (medium) and post processing (low) at 1024x768. The game never dips below 20fps.
 
i could play crysis on med at 1680x1050 on my old 7900gs
 
I beg to differ-I play crysis on my much slower 7800gt with everything set to high except for shaders (medium) and post processing (low) at 1024x768. The game never dips below 20fps.

I have a hard time believing that, but it would help knowing the rest of your system. On my rig (in sig), I can play more or less ok, during the first few levels. After that, it's almost a slideshow @ 1024x768, with most settings medium and the rest at high. At any rate, 20 fps is not good.
 
Actually, it's not. It's about even with the X1950 Pro and trades blows with the 8600 GTS most of the time. But for $95, it's a good buy.

I based that off the UT3 scores, but I guess other tests are closer. http://www.firingsquad.com/hardware/nvidia_geforce_8800_gt_performance/page10.asp
Not sure how it would be even with an X1950pro, considering that is a stripped down R580 and the 2900GT is a stripped down R600. But they do seem closer than I thought in some games so I guess saying it's "a lot" faster is an overstatement. ;)
 
I have a hard time believing that, but it would help knowing the rest of your system. On my rig (in sig), I can play more or less ok, during the first few levels. After that, it's almost a slideshow @ 1024x768, with most settings medium and the rest at high. At any rate, 20 fps is not good.

E4300 @ 3.4ghz, 2gb ballistix @ 500mhz, aw9d-max.

I will admit that during the first frozen island scene the framerate started dipping below 15fps and I had the set the shader setting to low in order to get the framerates back up to a smooth level. After that, I turned it back to medium and the game ran normal as usual. Even though the game was a bit choppy, I still enjoyed it :)
 
Back
Top