So here's the deal. I went and bought a D-link DI-634M the other day, to replace a D-Link DI-624 that had been problematic. Its MIMO, and I expected it to 'go the distance', only to find out it had the exact same (and in some cases worse) signal then the non-MIMO router. I moved the antennas and placement as much as I could, and still couldn't get what I wanted. The computers are about 60-70 feet away from the router going through maybe 2 walls. And I used netstumbler to configure best antenna placement, and it was still only a *little* stronger then the regular G router.
Now, I just have generic G adapters in the computers, and I know I can't expect to get the full potential of MIMO without a MIMO adapter as well. But my main concern here is this:
Do I keep the router, but go out and buy 2 MIMO adapter cards, and hope that improves signal?
Do I return the router (80 bucks) and with that credit, but a cheaper, regular G router, and an Access Point, spending maybe $30 after credit? (if so, reccomendations for Router + AP combinations would be helpful)
Or do I return the router and use the credit to buy a Linksys SRX400 at $130, spending maybe $50, and hope for better results?
Which do you think it the best course of action? Adapter changes, or router changes?
Now, I just have generic G adapters in the computers, and I know I can't expect to get the full potential of MIMO without a MIMO adapter as well. But my main concern here is this:
Do I keep the router, but go out and buy 2 MIMO adapter cards, and hope that improves signal?
Do I return the router (80 bucks) and with that credit, but a cheaper, regular G router, and an Access Point, spending maybe $30 after credit? (if so, reccomendations for Router + AP combinations would be helpful)
Or do I return the router and use the credit to buy a Linksys SRX400 at $130, spending maybe $50, and hope for better results?
Which do you think it the best course of action? Adapter changes, or router changes?