A) When you started this poll I told you that you where making a FALLACY!!!
This apparently slipped your mind, alongside my question (for the 3. time now!!!), if you know what a fallacy is? :)
B) The sampling number is far to SMALL to say anything.
Like you yourself say around 100 people...
When are you going to respond to my question about if you do or do not know what a fallcy is?
Please learn math and polling :rolleyes:
When users are give multple votes(options) you cannon just look at the "raw" percentages numbers like you tried to pull off.
That is BAD math...
And we always buy at the sites listed at MSRP, never the cheapest place right? ;)
Bottom line, you can get the PPU for less that $250 today.
Oh yeah?
Kinda hard to point fingers at ~70.000 members, care to moderate that sentence in accordance with reality? :)
A) first you try and dertermine the "usefulness" by appeal to majority(fallacy)
B) the you get the price of the PPU wrong(deliberatly?)
C) Then you math is all wrong (multiple voting (people that read and don't vote..like me))
D) Then you still cling on to your A, B and C like is has any real...
PhysX has nothing to do with DX9..stop thinking of the PPU like a GPU.
So people that game below 1600x1200 are not canditates for PhysX?
Gee, I wish you had told me that before I got my PhysX :rolleyes:
Neither you nor I have asked them...moot pint.
But find me a larger more...
Then point it out for me.
That the OP's question is "flawed" dosn't validate the continued walking donw a false path?
Gamedevelopers(wich have (fortunally) a good deal more that say that you) are adopting the PhysX.
No trolling/viral marketing can change that...sorry.
Fact of life.
So you agree, you first statemnet was flawed(once again)?
Out of +6 bill. people on ~70.000 found it nessary to register at [H]ard, point being?
And?
I don't make money of the PhysX, so what do I care? :)
A shame that AGIEA dosn't use viral trolls like ATI/NVIDIA does, then I could get...
Fore the adoptaion of who?
(Hint : developers)
Let me see.
For anything to get supported (like the 3D GPU) the "story" goes like this:
A) Hardware + drivers need to be on the market...check
B) Games need to support the hardware(developers)...check(list keeps growing for the PhysX)
C)...
Any board that support Conroe should support "Kentsfiled" AFAIK?
Coolaler from Xtremesystems.org, used the same board as he did for his Conroe AFIAK
That's the beauty of it, not need for a mobo/socket upgrade, just plug the CPU in and *BLAM* from dual-core to quad-core...
A) learn about polling
B) fin me aource that ells about the PPU sales or you pint is moot.
A) Learn about polling
[QOUTE]I couldn't agree with you more.
The interview was decent, a realistic person who doesn't talk like a scripted robot, but I'm still not convinced.
Ageia...
A) the more phycis in HL2 was one of the things gamers loved about that game.
B) I don't see any developers that have voted in that poll?
But lets take a look who is backing PhysX:
Hardware physcics isn't going anywhere...AGEIA is on the court, ATI/NVIDIA/Havok is in the dressing...
Just wait untill (if?) GPU-physcis comes out, he will be prasing it(GPU-physcis) to the clouds then...
Not matter how few(none?) games it supports..as long as it made by ATI ;)
Alomst the same situation back when the first 3D cards came about.
Not every one could see the benefit, wanted to pay for extra hardware ect.
But Quake made people change their minds.
/offtopic
Quake with Tenebrae mod actually looks damn good today, considering it's a old game...
I have some questions for you too.
Runnig a Asus P5P800 SE with Intel 865PE chipset and "hyperpath"(What Asus calls PAT on 865 boards and 3 settings I havn't got a clue to set (running them on AUTO now)
(Using the same Corsair RAM modules 2x1 GB in Dualchannel mode)
DRAM Burst Length (4, 8...
Got 2 BG of fast RAM allready...
Got a AGP Gainward 7800GS Bliss already
No SLI for AGP...
Got one allready...those are the reasons for I didn't vote.
And oh yeah, the PPU is < $250 your poll is flawed...nice try though :p...
The gamepaly of FEAR is very good, so your analogy is flawed...it's the A.I, story, and leveldesign that makes FEAR a great game
Besides FEAR has some problem with the graphical design.
Bullets only make "sparks" in Hollywood movies:
INSULTINGLY STUPID MOVIE PHYSICS