I need this to get my tubes bent. :). . . seriously though, I've been using their rads, etc. Planning on moving from an eisbaer config to a more flexibale open loop system and this would be VERY cool to have.
In other news, streaming video providers are making it harder for people to stop watching their content by inticing people to spend more time binge-watching entire series.
Depending on configuration, you could also run into users of a site who don't accept your cert issuer as a trusted root certifier, aren't getting the right intermediate certs, etc. Hardly seems worth the effort if you aren't delivering content which actually requires it.
Yeah, even at the tender young age of . . . however old I was when that came out, I just know it was a long ass time ago, I thought - hey, somebody came up with an even faster way to take all the change out of my pocket than playing Tron! (My favorite arcade game of all time when I was a kid).
I have one of these being delivered today.
I ordered one and received it last week, but when I took it out of the box, I heard a loose piece rattling inside the PSU, shook it till it came to the grill, looked like a small screw or something so wasn't about to plug it in.
Replacement will be...
In the U.S. National Broadband Plan of 2009, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) defined broadband access as "Internet access that is always on and faster than the traditional dial-up access"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_access
Yet it never ceases to amaze me how many people have no comprehension whatsoever of these facts.
They actually think that having 50 Democrats (and one Lieberman) in Congress somehow equates to "control."
The FCC has no taxing authority. The most they could do is set a licensing or other fee which could be passed on to consumers.
Only Congress has authority to tax.
Will people ever get tired of repeating this lie? At NO point was there a filibuster proof majority. What this means for those lacking in knowledge of how Congress works is that in the Senate, 60 votes are required for cloture on any legislation. That means, again for those deprived in...
Agreed for the most part, but once again, left to their own devices (as we've already witnessed with numerous data breaches of credit card info, etc.), companies will not make any real effort to secure their systems.
Ideally, you would need the companies to meet with people actually...
Unless of course you want to use a more narrow definition which an early Supreme Court justice stated, that being that the Congress is entitled to levy tax for the general welfare of the nation. Or, as Jefferson put it, to "provide for the welfare of the union." Which is to say, if you don't...
And another thing . . . it would appear that you have a complete lack of understanding as to what communism is (or slavery for that matter).
See, if communism was involved in any way, shape or form, we wouldn't be having this conversation because those companies would not be in private hands...
Name one bank that doesn't have a vault. Please. Now, considering economy of scale, tell me why ANY company should not be required to safeguard the information with which they are entrusted?
For that matter, if you are against safeguards such as this, why would you engage in a banking...
Here's a little tip for you . . . Benjamin Franklin was not, in any way, referring to the liberty of companies to not secure your personal data.
I know that might be a tad difficult for you to understand.
Here's another little tip for you . . . he was referring to individual liberty, not...
I see . . . so enlighten us oh most knowledgeable one . . . what does "Promote the general welfare" mean?
Does it or does it not mean the general welfare of the populace?
Please explain.
If those Americans are storing the private data, personal, financial, and medical information of other citizens, I'm all for it.
Since they aren't, it's kind of a moot point.
Of course, there are those would say that the Stuxnet incident was acceptable because it was Iran. OF course, if any nation did the same to us, those same people would want to destroy the entire violating country.
I'm not sure which is worse, that, or violating FISA with illegal wiretaps...
Except that's not the way it works. It never has been. That's the reason they began passing regulations in the first place.
If not for such regulation, you'd probably still have cocaine as an ingredient in coca cola. You'd also still have locks on doors preventing workers from leaving such...
Ooops, typo, it was only 12 episodes in 1998, and only 1 since 1999. That's despite a marked increase in population and the number of cars on the road.
http://www.jewishjournal.com/thewideangle/item/the_progress_is_invisible_20120720/
So it's your opinion that left entirely up to the discretion of individual companies, they would always act in the best interest of everyone? Or would they only act in the best interest of their bottom line?
If you removed government regulation completely, you'd be truly surprised how many...
What that means is that the bill itself was never actually voted on. The Republican filibuster prevented the ending of debate on the bill and thus prevented it from being presented for a vote on the bill itself.
God forbid that a business should have to spend money to make sure that their...
Do you have any other hard drives in the computer you're putting it in? Are they set up with active primary boot partitions? Are the two conflicting with each other?
If you have another drive in that machine, unplug it and try again.
So . . . how many of you complained when the Bush administration was caught violating FISA laws and monitoring calls of tens of millions of Americans?
Or do you only object to such intrusions when a Democratic governor from California does it?
When most of you finally realize that blaming...