Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.
Everything else being equal, I would have replaced my curved 57" with poor viewing angles with the 65" 8K I also have. There are some practical aspects of having a real monitor compared to a TV though and my work laptop not being able to run it at native resolution sealed the deal.
Nope - HP in the "light workstation" category. Was supposed to be able to run a real 8K resolution but that turned out to not be true so had to "downgrade" to this 8k2k monitor from my real 8K TV.
Blade runner never mentioned 240 hz though but perhaps this is a problem in all resolutions? Seems like it might be a GPU limitation rather than a monitor limitation though if it is possible with another GPU.
If you test the chroma 444 image from Rtings and switch between 240 and 60 hz, can you then see the difference for the "grey text on black"?
https://www.rtings.com/images/test-materials/2017/chroma-444.png
Also here you should be able to spot the difference...
Having tried this a bit more, it actually seem to be related to resolution. With the monitor in 240 hz mode, they problem seem to occur when running in native resolution 7680x2160 but not if I switch to 4K or something lower, still in 240 hz.
There are enough people confirming this to still be...
I have mulitple computers with different kind of GPUs and they all show the same problem in 240 hz. Have not really investigated it that much yet though, I know Rtings mentioned something about automatic color profile selection in Windows could be the problem.
You can see this quite easily by...
Seem to be conflicting reports on this, it is clearly visible on mine with 240 hz and based on the reddit thread above, so is the case with others. At the same time, Rtings seem to claim that they can't see it in their updated testing...
Have we ever been able to get a confirmation exactly what changes between 120 and 240 hz mode (both using HDMI 2.1)? I am trying it out now with my 5090 and I can see that the image quality is better with 120 hz than 240 hz with regards to text etc. but am not 100% sure that it is because of the...
Reading this, it kind of sounds like a crazy person :D :D
I've only used the 65" 8K, I believe there was another user here how used a 55" step down 8K model. For productivity and some lighter gaming, the 65" 8K is still the best "monitor" I have ever used. I've had to step down to the Neo G9...
That isn't really related to the monitor though but more each persons eye sight combined with viewing distance. Not to say that isn't relevant all in all of course, but it would kind of be like comparing two cars based on the skills of each driver.
It has the exact same vertical resolution as the Neo G9 57" (2160) so no. Unless you had to enable scaling of course but that would be true for all monitors.
Perhaps you are confusing it with the previous Neo G9s (which honestly would be more Samsungs fault due to the horrible naming of these...
It really comes down to usage and preference. If you mainly do gaming/entertainment in a somewhat dark room and OLED is probably the best choice. If you however do mainly work/productivity or game in a somewhat bright room, the Neo G9 57" is probably the way to go.
I compared the two recently...
Why do you even need 10 bit unless you do color critical work in which case you probably would not be looking at this monitor anyway? At least to me it seems far from ideal for that use case with local dimming, VA etc.
A 48" G5 is actually quite interesting in itself and it seems to be available for purchase even today - never heard of that before. Even better if it had been 42" or 35".
As mentioned before, an 8K monitor should be seen mainly as a multi monitor setup without bezels rather than a monitor to be used in full screen. At least assuming you have it at normal monitor viewing distance.
Dont have the monitor myself anymore but AFAIK the clicking problem has been around for years on the different versions of the G9s (at least the LCD ones). It seems like the construction in itself is challenging, from what I know it is basically two 32" panels side by side but have never seen...
I've always felt that being able to do custom resolution on the PC is a much better alternative than these built in ones.
Also having to rely on DSC tend to limit scaling options in general from my experience, something that probably would not have been needed with actual DP2.1. This isn't a...
And the reason is simple - it is a 2560x1080 signal that has been "upscaled". Glad we got that sorted, thanks.
Edit: To be fair, you are far from the first person making this mistake. It used to be in the form of "OMG, my QHD monitor can do 4K!" or something like that :)