Search results

You ignore all my other points above, the pages I specifically referenced as an example -which evaluated cost subracted (for things like delivery) prices-, and continue to provide no information of your own. I'm not sure how I got sucked into being trolled, but I'm getting out.

https://www.questia.com/read/6026672/the-trust-problem-in-the-united-states Pages 78-80. Unaccounted price variation outside of cost correlated to market competition. As for continuing this argument, you gaslight my explanations demanding facts while providing non of your own, all the while...

1. It's not the "only" proof. You neglect to mention that Standard Oil (of Ohio) actually lost the original case in 1892. A timeline that is much more interesting to your pricing details. 2. A decline in price doesn't prove commoditization as the driving market factor. A quick glance at other...

McGee certainly didn't prove that. He did dissect how predatory pricing wouldn't work in practice, based on economic data for that market, and used it to conclude that Standard Oil didn't use it, and if they did, it didn't have the intended effect. He said "I am convinced that Standard did not...

Uh no. It's quite unlike Standard Oil's Predatory pricing. YouTube invested in a large distribution system that through economies of scale greatly reduces it's current operation costs. It's still making money and running above cost. That is an extremely important distinction.

Long time lurker. Made an account to maybe win some hardware. I desperately try to avoid these kinds of conversations; but I'm literally blown away by the reaction to this. It's not censorship. You don't have a right to use someone else's service to do what ever you want AND get paid for it...

ONCE