Search results

I was getting around 96% with my 780 on clevermining, I think the switching pools have slightly higher rejects but overall higher payout assuming you never intended to hold alt coins. As far as Precision X, it doesn't properly read voltage it just gives VID and it won't actually monitor...

Unless you're using crazy 1.4v on the 4770k with fixed voltage I wouldn't worry about the cpu much assuming you have C states enabled.

I get endless errors if the oc isn't stable.

If your cards don't all overclock the same you can do them individually.

Has anyone tried it with CGMiner yet?

I was under the impression that a standard x1 slot could only provide at max 25w of power.

FTW comes with a $10 rebate, it's the one I've been considering personally. I'm waiting for more info of course, and to see if skynet releases a bios for these cards.

I heard there will be a 1GB version for ~$125, I'm going to wait to see if that's real or not cause neither mining gaming or physx really need 2GB.

So to be clear, your argument is if you don't use the GPU physx and use CPU only physx that you don't need additional GPU power?

Waiting for the 750 Ti Classified King Pin Edition with 1900MHz Samsung vram. Hopefully your math gets destroyed though, even still 300 kh/s at ~60w is crazy efficiency.

I'm really itching to get the FTW model to see what it can do.

635 kh/s @ 230 GB/s 735 kh/s @ 326 GB/s 42% more bandwidth ~ 16% hash increase. I imagine I would need to test 267 GB/s to see if it gets the same hash as 320 GB/s and thus it stopped scaling after no longer needed the additional bandwidth. And here I didn't think vram made much of a...

More interested in seeing what happens with optimizations and settings played with. Obviously with a fixed platform power draw the 750 Ti has a disadvantage, but I can do 430 kh/s at 265w or 508 kh/s at 265w or 560 kh/s at 265w just by changing a few settings in cudaminer. Point here is...

I get "exceeds warp kernel limit" with 12x32. How are you only pulling 375w at 1400? That is pretty amazing!

If you dont mind me asking, what's your config? Tried something different and got up to 560 kh/s @ 265w, its not great but it isn't awful either. I had a 750 Ti FTW in my cart but decided to wait for some results.

GK110 is actually more efficient than GK104, however I think that is partly because 104 is bus starved more often. You see it with GK110 when overclocking aswell, just ask Face2Face about spinning your wheels increasing power draw for little return when running a 780 at 1400 core but only 1650...

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814487025

Error in the ad, the Ti is 640.

Please do ;)

290 wasn't looking good at release either, maybe give the program and users time to mess with it a bit before writing it off. 450 for the 270 is with an OC and considerably more power. $260 for 300 kh/s before OC @ 125w vs $150 for 265 kh/s @ 60w with an unoptimized miner. Neither option is...

Sorry, I had two and that was combined in total hashing power. Didn't know the 270 hashed so well until Google. With an OC 450 kh/s at probably ~180w not bad at all.

270 is that close to the 7950? I did 500 @ 800\1500 with my 7950 and that used ~150w with 850mv.

lol, its probably had three different owners over those 15 years. Should be getting some user results in a few days, should shed some more light on it. My 7950s did 1000 kh/s @ 330w or 1300 @ 550w, my 780 has pretty awful kh/w by comparison. Probably wouldn't consider farms with the 750...

Looking at this card personally. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814487028

Not for $199 :eek: Yes it's interesting from the standpoint that it uses so little power, produces decent enough kh/s it could pay for itself in a few months, with almost no noise pollution... HTPC comes to mind, dedicated PhysX card you can mine when not using it for that purpose while still...

Explain why my 780 gets 670 kh/s with 1250 mem and my 7950 got 700 kh/s with 1750 memory, 650 with 1500 mem? 670 kh/s not enough to saturate Kepler at 1250 but easily smothers Thaiti at similar kh/s? The explanation was for AMD cards, I don't think you can apply it to cudaminer and Nvidia cards.

680? 265 you mean?

It is for sure with AMD, with my 7950s I overclocked the ram to 1700 because it made a fairly big difference. With my 780 I set the memory to -500 and it has no impact on my kh/s. I find it interesting, gonna have to keep up on it to see how it plays out.

It's interesting... 60w nets you 265 kh/s even without optimizations on a stock reference card which is what 1k boost or thereabouts? How much will bandwidth effect performance, it has little to no effect on my 780 and it's pretty clear from the 1400MHz Palit OC from Guru the card is severely...

Looks amazing, but I wouldn't hold my breathe on gm100/110 in the first series unless AMD puts out. Still hoping I can skip Maxwell altogether for Volta with G-Sync, but if the leap from a 900MHz 470 to a 1300 MHz 780 is dwarfed by what Maxwell is capable of than it will be very hard to pass it up.

Have you considered changing the TIM?

Nope, it's a custom card with a custom 8+2 phase design. I have one myself, the cooler is capable of benching 1.4v with 100% fan speed for me personally. It can also remain fairly quite under 1.3v full load sustained gaming. It makes the TF3 cooler on my 7950 look last gen.

Pretty sure that is a CPU error, download this and get the error code. http://www.nirsoft.net/utils/blue_screen_view.html

Just an FYI that isn't the GHz edition, it has the 6+8 layout and no backplate. I hope you figured that out before it shipped or it was your intention not to get the GHz edition :(

Works in everything else, but not Hawken :(