Search results

Yes, Kyle has read it, we haven't, so contextually these snippets may well make more sense if they've understood it correctly (I'm not insinuating that's not the case). I think it's a pretty straightforward question given the nature of the piece. Really, it's what the whole thing is alluding to...

https://pcgamesn.com/nvidia-geforce-partner-program-amd-impact Someone beat you to it. Sanity prevails? One version certainly makes a lot more sense...

People are very fickle. It's also very difficult to form an arguement about consumer choice between vendors when there isn't any.

That's not a GPU.

This is exactly why this whole thing has been blown wide open prematurely. No disclosure has been made publically as to what exactly vendors intend to do about this, and ultimately, isn't that the real story here? We know vendors are joining the program, why wouldn't they? The element of hand...

Even on a bad day, that's a poor effort. Also technically that would be on the record. ;)

Ok, well that's a poor assumption on your part. I'm fully aware of trust between sources in the industry, that's not the issue. The issue is speaking for them and then giving your readers the wishy-washy backend of the story. The problem with that is you create this big media bubble that you...

I tagged the person I was replying to, I've already moved on ;)

How does that help anyone in this thread? I can speak to vendors off the record, too. It's just a general consensus based on nothing more than conjecture. On or off the record, the outcome is what impacts whether this is truly anti-competitive practice or incentive.The program is obviously...

Believe me, you'd have to be more ignorant to form an opinion on what you don't know. So tell me, what exactly do we (the collective we) know about what board partners forward plan is for this? That's right, you can't. Sorry, who's ignorant? lol

So in short, you believe whatever is put in front of your face by the press and ignore the fact that, the partners, who are the ones directly and foremost affected by this program, have yet to comment? It's common sense, surely? You haven't heard from board partners as to how this affects...

It's not hard, at all. It is if you're a journalist poking around, trying to jump the gun. Sounds like [H] have absolutely no idea how this affects GPU rebranding. This is going to be forgotten before you can say "controversial AMD Chinese whispers".

Hi Dan, I wasn't referencing the clock speed, I was referencing the current and voltage relationship. The point was, and still is, that the level of voltage you used with Prime will degrade a CPU. This includes Haswell-E, which is why in my last post I mentioned being aware of the huge amount...

This makes it seem like you still don't understand the implications of using the feature whilst overclocking, so may be worth re-reading the part of my post you did not address, or taking the time to actually read the link in my last post. Depends, the contrast is definitely there. So far in...

No worries! The Asus Edge guide for the Thermal Control Tool covers the conditions that AVX offset needs to be used How to get the best performance from Broadwell-E processors - The ASUS Thermal Control Tool - Edge Up

Broadwell-E's IMC has improved. This was not only noted in ASUS' overclocking overview, but several users over at Overclock.net including myself have established that a lot of these processor are capable of running exceptionally tight sub timings, close to or at the minimal spacing required at...

What makes you think these degrade, or even that the memory controller is not improved?

Dan, can you tell me whether you are using adaptive or manual when running the stress tests for this review?