Search results

http://fudzilla.com/graphics/item/22274-gtx-590-bios-is-good-no-changes "NVIDIA's reference GTX 590 VBIOS on the production boards has not changed, and we have not provided a new VBIOS to AICs or end users for GTX 590. The original GTX 590 VBIOS that NVIDIA shipped is good for customers to use...

As long as you don't game, it doesn't matter.

Please, take off your red-tinged glasses!

http://www.kitguru.net/components/graphic-cards/jules/updated-gtx590-bios-rushed-out-to-repair-reputation/ :confused:

http://techreport.com/discussions.x/20677 For the tl;drs: It doesn't blow up, it doesn't down clock in games and the thermal camera readings meassure the power regulation circuitry, nothing to worry about. *popcorn*

Took you quite some time but better late than never.

Where does it say he didn't test higher voltages?

Yes, absolutely, the GTX590 delivers when overclocked. :D

Depends on the game and resolution obviously. Though, for what those cards are intended, I'd agree that AMD delivers a better performance. Has been done by the very same reviewers and no card died. :rolleyes: You should read some more.

Update http://www.computerbase.de/artikel/grafikkarten/2011/test-nvidia-geforce-gtx-590/7/#abschnitt_frameverlaeufe Gone.

Swedish site: (fryed 2 cards) http://www.sweclockers.com/nyhet/13710-geforce-gtx-590-brinner-i-sweclockers-testlabb-drivrutin-boven-i-dramat Romanian site...

What? Please, spare me with your apple logic. IQ is obviously better on ISP panels than on TNs. It doesn't matter whether it's running Windows or OS X.

Interesting, I've read an interview with a guy of the IAEA saying the exact opposite. Well, in that case, sensationalism wins.

Up to this date it's pure speculation whether the earthquake itself or the following tsunami caused the failure.

Summer 6950 -> 6970 Wait few months Ebay sell "+unlocked" Buy 28nm Happy

It's fanboy fud. I myself have a 27 iMac. Looks great due to the IPS display but the IQ doesn't differ in BC or other IPS displays running Windows.

Oh my God.

From what I gather, Computerbase used Fraps (in slomo probably) to create those line charts. Though, not sure how representative 5 games are, considering that only 2 games show significant differences.

Indeed, Europeans still rely heavily on donkeypower.

That simply not true. After you barged into the discussion I asked you to prove me wrong. You came, you tried, you failed. Live with it.

That's a big number but the profit(GPU) is rather disappointing, no? Still, good to see AMD back in black. :D

You're quite emotional about your newly acquired graphics card as it seems. Keep in mind though, that I did in no way say your 3 GTX 480s are inferior or that it was a bad purchase. All I did was refuting the statement that SLI scales better than CF. Out of context? Explain, because we...

What has that to do with scaling? You barged into a discussion I had with another guy, you should know what the topic was. I'll quote myself again. No problem mate but don't enter into a discussion about something you don't know.

Do you actually understand what GPU scaling means? The specific TWIMTBP game you linked to shows better scaling on AMD's part.

And where's the better scaling? As already mentioned, there are no 5870s.

Then enlighten me and link me to one. There are various links in this thread that don't show a better scaling for SLI.

Okey, I'm still puzzled why SLI scales better though. Everything I've seen so far does not indicate this. So, what's the basis of your statement?

So, you're saying scaling is worse on DX11?

Elaborate please.

Sorry, I thought people were familiar with TPU. http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/NVIDIA/GeForce_GTX_480_SLI/30.html http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ATI/Radeon_HD_5870_CrossFire/27.html

5870CF 480SLI This particular test (approx. 20 games) shows the opposite though?

+CPU @stock +GPU/s @stock

You realize that this scene from Downfall has been used probably over a hundred times with different subjects? It's sort of a running gag and the Intel clip certainly wasn't the original one.

find you must.

"NO I NEED TO SPAM THE HARDWARE FORUMS ABOUT THE AWESOME MINIMUM FPS WHILE THE ATI FANBOYS LAUGH AT ME" :D But seriously, massive grammar fail. Btw. is it me or is YouTube's new layout just plain ugly and utterly confusing? What the hell did they think..

5850 should be good. I can't recommend the new GTX470/480 either, especially since you're using 2 monitors. It would automatically up the temperature to 90C at idle.

In retrospective, this thread is quite hilarious.

So, are the load times on a GF100 any better? I haven't seen it being mentioned anywhere, wonder if it's typical for DirectX11 or just an ATI thing.

:eek: http://www.tomshardware.com/news/PAX-AMD-Phenom-II-X6,10004.html

I guess they went red.