Search results

Play campaign first, like I did until I completed them all in expert, then move on to versus.

When I used it they did have a limit to how many times it could be installed, Steam does not have that limitation.

EA screwed me out of several games because it stated that I had installed it on different computers. I will never buy games from the EA store again. I spent a whole month battling with there god awful support telling them that it had said I exceeded my installation limit. They told me to...

Thanks for chiming in, If you haven't played the second one your opinion has been invalidated. You are purely speculating on a previous experience with a somewhat similar game. If you feel you got ripped off, hey it happens that's life, people make bad purchases all the time. But hey thanks for...

You can add me, (took out my name don't want random people adding) send me a pm I play a lot of versus too. <--- still something to prove, real deal

I kick them right away, problem solved.

why the hell would it be steams fault???

TIA

Oh you're talking about versus, I thought you meant campaign.

You know he's kidding right? Unless you're playing on easy or something. Seriously though you have to shoot your teammates always near the end so that when it comes time to jump on the boat/helicopter then all the horde are distracted. That's when you make your big finale.

Or how about if you don't like the game you don't pirate it either, that's a dick move =/

Or how about if you don't like the game don't pirate it either, that's a pretty dick move =/

blame vista, nvidia drivers has sucked especially for us early os adopters. Infact most of the crashes with vista when it first came up were attributed to the fact that nvidia can't code properly

hmm looks good I might give this a try, I really need to build a dedicated server. I have to save some money. I am using my gaming desktop for now.

Thanks for the response do you think I would have any luck if I had a actual raid controller instead of using ICH9?

Do you mean access the discs through Hyper-V instead of ESXi? or were you able to access the discs through ESXi once you had installed Hyper-V? I'm a little confused, did you end up nesting Hyper-V? Thanks

I think it has something to do with the storage adapter type. When I was using ESXi 3.5 update 3 the storage adapter was scsi, now in ESXi 4.0 it is block scsi, this is the same with 3.5 update 4. I actually rolled back on update 4 because of this. Anyway to change the storage adapter type...

thanks for the heads up, here are my results t10.ATA_____WDC_WD1001FALS2D00J7B0________________________WD2DWMATV0883946 Device Type: Direct-Access Size: 953869 MB Display Name: Local ATA Disk (t10.ATA_____WDC_WD1001FALS2D00J7B0_____________...

Thanks for getting back to me lopoetve I tried using the option esxcfg-mpath -l but neither the naa or mpx is displayed I get this sata.vmhba33-sata.0:0-t10.ATA_____SAMSUNG_HD103UJ_________________________S13PJDWQA29925______ Runtime Name: vmhba33:C0:T0:L0 Device...

Anyone have any experience with creating RDM's on ESXi 4.0 using vmkfstools -r? I installed ESXi 4.0 and I want to use local storage as a RDM, in 3.5 I use to use the command vmkfstools -r /vmfs/devices/disks/vmhba33:0:0:0 /vmfs/volumes/disk1.vmdk The command doesnt work now and I get...

That's not even an answer to his question

I am actually having the same problem, I set up a 2nd router for the second nic and hooked up the wan link to the first router. Which works half way but i cant ping from the 1st router to the 2nd, but I can ping from the 2nd to the first. Any ideas would be appreciated as well.If I had a l3...

vista is actually a benefit, you actually have more security options available to lock it down, if you have access to active directory you can lock it down easily. what version of vista?

safe, thanks for the above poster in pointing me to the right direction

I got it to work, pm me for details, figured it out thanks to the virtual file server thread in this sub forum

I will worship the ground you walk on if you can help me with this. I apologize for my abrupt response, it was meant to entice people to prove me wrong =)

I am having the same problem, the command you provided does not work for me though, can you provide me with some assistance please?

I agree with this, planning on build a nas soon because of it

not possible, I spent a long time researching rdm a local disk

rofl, must be one hell of a lan party

lol maybe i7 would make it tolerable

Im assuming this would work if it was on a dedicated box, no? I think the problem is that its virtualized. I can install x86 operating systems, its slow but bearable.

vista 64, am I SOL?

Yes I did I did the following: enabled vt, reboot install new vm red hat linux 4 x64 scsi logic: 250gb bridged networking processor: 1 chose the VT option ram: 4gb removed: usb removed: sound removed: floppy network: bridged, replication host connection closed vmware edited...

No same error unfortunately, still cant install x64

I have vmware esxi 3.5 build 123629 running in vmware workstation 6.5. I cant install any 64 bit operating systems it says "attempting to load a x64 operating system, however this cpu is not compatible with x64 mode." I have a c2d 6750 with VT enabled, and I am able to install x64 OS's under...

with 1 GB of ram, yeah your vista experience would be craptastic, thanks for contributing

Also it looks like your on wireless, is your network secure? what kind of router, wireless card, encryption, wireless settings do you have?

You do realize that's in bytes right?

Ive heard of the problem, someone pm'ed me on it before. Thank god it never happened to me though. What brand memory and what type X-FI?